Archaeologica.org

To help people with attitudes like a 6th grader understand it

I have a shaft of a human bones verified by a surgeon and a forensic scientist. The surgeon sasy 90%, the Forensic guy says 99% but can't give it 100% without the femoral ends. It equates to 2.46m (8'1"). There are photos of it on our site. Obviously we need more but we aren't the only ones wit...

and yet.... https://tangatawhenua16.wixsite.com/the ... ood-enough

There are countless pictures of giant bones on the internet, most of them copies of copies of copies of fakes. Generally a human could not exceed 9' without serious alterations to normal skeletal structure, due to the square cube law. This is covered in our website on the date - Jun 8, 2016. All the...

12 year old shite is still shite

"The Waipoua Forest became a controversial site in New Zealand because an archaeological dig apparently showed evidence of a non-Polynesian culture that preceded the Maori-...." Bollocks. And that really is all that can be said about this. There is not one scrap of 'evidence' even if I wis...

Sorry but this is biggest load of shite I've seen. First of all Pitcairn is not part of NZ, it's 5500km away by sea. Secondly the title suggesting the script is Maori is deliberately mislead suggesting the premise of Pitcairn of having anything to do with NZ on the basis of not just grossly incorrec...