Search found 94 matches

by Tech
Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:47 am
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: 1421 - the year China Discovered the World
Replies: 11
Views: 5123

I take it you have the Gavin Menzies book ? I have read a few supporting articles usually to do with the Zheng He map which if genuine is compelling evidence . http://www.heritageeast.com/history/1421/who_discovered_america.htm Though I have read many articles debunking Menzies Theory http://www.ken...
by Tech
Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:16 am
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: archaeological categories
Replies: 88
Views: 43231

OAS
D.F.T.T.
by Tech
Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:27 am
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: dr. schoch and his contribution to archaeology
Replies: 516
Views: 112112

Nobody can seem to agree on the errossion, even geologists , and as far as I know the following is the only text reference which seems to indicate Khufu finding not building "Long live ... the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Khufu, given life ...He found the House of Isis, Mistress of the Pyrami...
by Tech
Thu Sep 21, 2006 9:37 am
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: pre clovis america
Replies: 323
Views: 90136

AOS This may seem idiotic on the surface , but we all seem to forget the human factor . Man doesnt always have a logical reason for doing a particular thing . The migration could have been an almagamation of many factors , from herd migration , climate , ostrisised tribes turning nomad , theres alwa...
by Tech
Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:46 am
Forum: Old World
Topic: Giza
Replies: 902
Views: 337400

Beagle , I've had enough , no more zealots who cant give a straight answer and no more lunatic fringe elemnts for me thx
by Tech
Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:44 am
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: archaeological categories
Replies: 88
Views: 43231

I have never rejected any evidence (dont count the bible I refuse to go that path ) .If you have a post where I rejected any evidence offered please enlighten me . To the best of my knowledge you have never offered tangible evidence in any reply .
by Tech
Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:22 am
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: archaeological categories
Replies: 88
Views: 43231

I will take that as a no on other written evidence then.
You are always first to ask for evidence from others I noticed ,
why wont you reciprocate .
Facts , evidence , fossils , artifacts .
If you want to debate or prove a point at least one of the above IS required .
by Tech
Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:30 am
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: archaeological categories
Replies: 88
Views: 43231

Sorry Arch but
evidence of nothing = nothing
Puting aside artifacts do you have any references to written texts (apart from the bible) Egyptian or otherwise that directly confirm the exodus ? If so please post links .
by Tech
Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:22 am
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: Book Recommendations.
Replies: 63
Views: 29105

Guest
I suppose it depends on how in depth a text you are looking for .
One I found varied and instructive was -
Human Antiquity An Introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archaeology by Feder, K.L. & M.A. Park
by Tech
Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:50 am
Forum: Old World
Topic: Giza
Replies: 902
Views: 337400

GV I have looked at millers Idea for the celtic cross before and though great claims are made there are many discrepancies. All true celtic crosses found have been dated AD No celtic cross has ever been found with degree markings There are no written references to using the celtic cross as a navigat...
by Tech
Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:00 am
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: archaeological categories
Replies: 88
Views: 43231

maybe it was because the finds at Hisarlik proved the Iliad to have factual references , where as the lack of finds for the exodus........
by Tech
Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:16 pm
Forum: Old World
Topic: Giza
Replies: 902
Views: 337400

My razors are sharp enough thanks , I was just curious to see if the math had any basis in fact
by Tech
Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:12 pm
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: pre clovis america
Replies: 323
Views: 90136

Nothing against long posts here . Interesting reading , I have come across some of those results from other sources . There does seem to be enough evidence to support a 17k- 15k Bp dating but I think they really need fossil or artifact evidence to verify the 35k Bp . Hopefully not all the required e...
by Tech
Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:46 pm
Forum: Archived Discussion Forum
Topic: pre clovis america
Replies: 323
Views: 90136

That may be the case as the established timeline is changing constantly as new finds are made , ie: The news from Virginia, reported by Mammoth Trumpet, is not good for advocates of the Clovis Horizon as first Amerind settlement of North America. Two sites with clear stratigraphy contained levels be...
by Tech
Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:35 pm
Forum: Old World
Topic: Giza
Replies: 902
Views: 337400

Truthfully stan I have no Idea about astronomy thats why I left the question open ,math I understand thats why I found it interesting