Zangger refutes Cline throughout his entire lecture, tiompan.Tiompan wrote:Not that it matters what his opinions of others are , but where does he actually refute Cline ?E.P. Grondine wrote: It appears Professor Zanger does not think too highly of Cline's 1177.
That's what matters .
The core issue for most Israeli archaeologists as they try to build their national myth focuses on the date for Exodus.
Since Cline has a late date in line with theirs, his book is very "acceptable".
That is not my problem, and given its highly controversial nature, I try to avoid Israleli Bronze Age archaeology in general.
I deal with hard data concerning impact events. Such as the "Joshua" Impact Event, and the end of LM 1B.