Roman Coins Found In Britain

The Old World is a reference to those parts of Earth known to Europeans before the voyages of Christopher Columbus; it includes Europe, Asia and Africa.

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Post Reply
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16013
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Roman Coins Found In Britain

Post by Minimalist »

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/0 ... p-friends/
Hoard of 2,000-year-old silver Roman coins unearthed by group of friends and a metal detector
First century, Flavian Dynasty. Plus other great finds.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
kbs2244
Posts: 2472
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:47 pm

Re: Roman Coins Found In Britain

Post by kbs2244 »

"Although they discovered it in 2015, it has been kept secret until now, to enable archaeologists to explore the site first."

So much for transparency.
Simon21
Posts: 642
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 4:40 am

Re: Roman Coins Found In Britain

Post by Simon21 »

Let us hope the figures are correct. It is said that the number declared is sometimes less than that found. The "excess" ends up on ebay.
kbs2244
Posts: 2472
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:47 pm

Re: Roman Coins Found In Britain

Post by kbs2244 »

Say it isn't so
All these finds are "royal property"
Government property.
This sale of "excess" you speak of would be theft of government property!
Simon21
Posts: 642
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 4:40 am

Re: Roman Coins Found In Britain

Post by Simon21 »

kbs2244 wrote:Say it isn't so
All these finds are "royal property"
Government property.
This sale of "excess" you speak of would be theft of government property!
Well quite, precious metal objects are declared treasure and must be (I believe) sold to the state at market value - the landowner gets 50%, the finder 50% - it is called the portable antiquities scheme.

Scandalously non precious metal objects are not covered. So we have atrocities like the Crosby Garret helmet - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crosby_Garrett_Helmet.

This was found deliberately destroyed (perhaps as a tribute to its owner) but before archaeologists could properly examine it it was given to Christies to auction. They promptly "restored it" so it is now more resin than bronze and is partly the restorer's impression of what such a helmet should look like - much of its archaeological value has been destroyed, though they did discover the visor showed signs of wear, indicating that it was actually worn.
Post Reply