Archaeologica.org

It's a proven fact.

Bill Clinton used to try that convoluted weasely language to deny everything. He got impeached.

Nobody believes you.

rubbish
youre the only one who is saying it
and you have been proven wrong
but as I have proven several times
you called me dishonest when I first started posting here
because I happened to belong to another forum
that claim was out of order
it was also a blatant lie
seems the only liar here is you beagle
which of course is why you are still personally attacking me in every post
the truth is out there you know
and I seem to be the one with links that prove it

like how you claimed that i had lied and then saw the light and said this

Beagle wrote:That is the reason you did not lie. Ok

sounds like you realised you had made a mistake
now youre back on track again like a broken record
still trying to claim that I am somehow at fault when clearly this is all coming from you
http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewt ... &start=810

The post above is exactly what tech said it was. It's obvious what you meant.

You just need a little more rope, huh?

yes it was obvious what I meant
clearly i meant that Hollywood had depicted william wallace having a blue face as totally incorrect because the scots at that time who had emigrated from ireland didnt do that
like duh
you however can make of it what you like
dishonest people do that all the time
pretend something is something it isn't
like you claiming to be scots irish
and dropping the scots part because it happened to be st paddys day
choose to be whatever suits your agenda dont you Lee

Many people have read the discussion about your previous lie and how you tried to weasel out of it. And now you take that sentence out of context. Or, is it possible that your thinking is so concrete that you actually believe what you post?

My final word for now,as I have things to do, is that you are caught in another lie. The biggest lies are in your effort to cover it up.

If you say something, you should have the guts and the character to stand by it. Or apologize.

You can do neither.

marduk wrote:I liked the pictish war paint though
very accurate portrayal of an Irish Immigrant scotsman I thought

At the risk of being blamed as biased or one-sided or what-ever. I just feel compelled to say that this was clearly a snide remark against Hollywood. I personally have never seen it any other way.

If Tech has some problem with Marduk, let Tech take it up with him. I'm not sure if really does because he has made no more statements.



I'm going to suggest a "Let's Get Marduk" forum where all this can be isolated and everyone who has issues can line-up and take their shots.
Sheesh!

You guys would argue with a fence post. However, I must say I find it very entertaining.
Last Sunday I went to see the movie. Entertaining but over the top visually. I thought the History Channel did a better job. Like every movie or TV Program I've ever seen that dipicts something from the past it was more for the audience entertainment than the actual history of the event. Face it most people wouldn't go see historical movies or watch TV programs if they just gave the actual facts. I read a book about the 300 about 7 or 8 years ago much better than the film.
Get back to your arguing I'm really bored today.

If you say something, you should have the guts and the character to stand by it. Or apologize.

You can do neither.

so I am not standing by my claim that I didn't insult Celts with my comment
please provide evidence of this
and
I have already apologised

Marduk wrote:Fair comment
I apologise for any offense

http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewt ... &start=810
seems you have decided to ignore that because it doesn't fit into your agenda either
this comment I made after twice offering you a truce
but I expect you don't remember that either
face it Beagle
youre not a very nice person

and you're a terrible liar

You guys would argue with a fence post.

Donna, quite frankly I think the fence post would topple from boredom first!

Cognito wrote:

You guys would argue with a fence post.

Donna, quite frankly I think the fence post would topple from boredom first!

Completely off the point but it did remind me of a joke.

A 70-year-old Texas Rancher got his hand caught in a gate while working cattle. He wrapped the hand in his bandana and drove his pickup to the doctor. While suturing the laceration, the doctor asked the old man about George W. Bush being in the White House.

The old Texan said, "Well, ya know, Bush is a 'Post Turtle.'"

Not knowing what the old man meant, the doctor asked what a Post Turtle was.

The old man looked at him and drawled, "When you're driving down a country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that's a Post Turtle."

The old man saw a puzzled look on the doctor's face, so he continued to explain:

"You know he didn't get there by himself, he doesn't belong there, he can't get anything done while he's up there, and you just want to help the poor dumb bastard get down."

seems you have decided to ignore that because it doesn't fit into your agenda either
this comment I made after twice offering you a truce
but I expect you don't remember that either
face it Beagle
youre not a very nice person

and you're a terrible liar

How many times must you be told? You've had a truce for months now. We've all seen what you did with that. When I stopped ignoring you, you asked for a truce the same day. You seem pretty slimy to me.

Most people regard me as a nice fellow. There is only one person on this board who is being caught in numerous bald faced lies.

Stop being a rude smart ass, stop your lying, and just stay out of my way.

Most people regard me as a nice fellow.

Laughable

There is only one person on this board who is being caught in numerous bald faced lies.

transference

Stop being a rude smart ass, stop your lying, and just stay out of my way.

pompous




I have offered you a truce twice
I have apologised for any comments that offended you
and yet you still persist in childish personal attacks
its becoming quite clear that you're a bully Beagle and like all bully's that means that you're a coward
who'd do anything to make himself look good in what he thinks are the eyes of his assumed friends
listen up buddy
you're nothing
you don't know anything
and when the truth is handed to you on a platter you don't recognise it
maybe you should go back to ignoring my posts
and I will ignore yours


now if you'd like the truth go back through every post of yours in this thread which I started to discuss historical based movie fiction
none of them were on topic
all of them were personal attacks
basically you are lowering the tone every time you have posted
you're very presence in this thread drags it into the gutter
and every post of yours in this thread was in breach of the c of c
and youre trying to tell us you're a nice guy
once again a claim made when all the evidence is to the contrary

maybe you should go back to ignoring my posts
and I will ignore yours

That should have happened before. Your best bet is to heed what I said in my last post.

You're not to be trusted.

You're not to be trusted.

we're all still waiting for the evidence on that
you're just like Arch claiming there is evidence that proves his pov but never managing to provide it
I have proved you a liar on more than one occaison
want me to link them all up again so people can see what a two faced liar you are ?
closest you've got to proving I am is misconstruing what someone smarter than you has said
must happen a lot
face it Beagle you wouldn't win a battle of wits with a stuffed Iguana

I stand by everything I've said. We went through "proof" yesterday. You'll still have to face that music.

Again - heed my post.