another post in the form of a personal attack
He did. You said he didn't think they were authentic. He said he did
this is a blatant lie
at no time has he stated that the Fuente Magna is authentic
if he had
then prove it
He happens to be the person that the Bolivian scientists requested to translate these writings.
this is also not true
he just happened to translate it himself in order to add it to his collective proof that civilisation in S America was founded by africans and World mysteries picked it up and added it to their webpage
this of course means that world mysteries is not a credible source
funnily enough it was world mysteries that you used as evidence
and here if you must have it is a picture of hsi translating which shows you how accurate it is
see where he says "Kur" four times on the right hand side
here is Kur from the electronic pennsylvania sumerian dictionary as you can see if it was written by a sumerian scribe it would be three triangles joined together. not two facing each other as he has read it
he claims it means "Ti Kur kur kur kur "
Approach in the future
when actually Kur means "underworld; land, country; mountain(s); east;"
he isn't qualified to read Sumerian
his translation is incorrect
he wasn't invited to translate it but did it for his own reasons
so whichever way you now want to claim you don't care what he believes in you must admit that it has coloured his reason for doing it
I asked if you would let the forum know whether or not you agreed with a letter that I will post. Read that again. That means you have the opportunity to say that you do not agree with it. What is your answer?
what makes you think you are speaking on behalf of the forum
from what I have seen you are usually in a minority of one here
I can't say that apart from your friend anyone ever agrees to any claim you have made
most people realise that your level of scholarship is not that effective and that you generally use any information you can no matter how unreliable it is to try and prove a point on something that long ago has been proven to be something different. thats quite usual in pseudoscientific approaches and also the reason why it never proves anything
I thought you might learn something from my patience with you on this matter and my kind words to you and my showing of credible evidence
clearly that is not the case
obviously when I see this letter that you are proposing to write then I will most likely let you have my opinion anyway
it will be backed with links and overwhelming evidence to prove my point as usual