Hey Gunny! I'm sorry that I didn't get aroundto responding to your last post here. I'm not notified when there's an snswer to mypostings and so I didn't see it. Anyway, isn't the rifle neat!? SInce mylast posting, additional information has come to light from the family from whom the rifle was obtained 45 years ago. Their ancestor was an under or sub Lt. in the San Luis Potosi Batalion under the command of a Colonel Morales. THis unit was tasked with the objective of attacking the South East wall that the Tennesseans had errected between the
Alamo church and the south wall and main gate. Upon attacking, the Mexican troops were stopped cold and had to shift to their left down the Southern wall. THis resulted in their subsequent attack on the South West corner of the
Alamo whre an 18 pounder cannon stood at the top of the wall at that corner. The position with the cannon was assulted and the cannon captured, all defenders there being put to death. Then, the Potosi troops ran down the ramp from the platform into the plaza below and opened the main gates, allowing the bulk of the atackers to enter in force. The family recounts that the rifle was retrieved from that gereral area by their ancestor after the battle and before it could be taken by anyone else. Apparently, the rifle's owner had been killed in the compound below that spot. The rifle was loaded up with the Officer's other property and plunder onto one of three mules that the young officer had aquired. The Postosi troops were subsequently attached to General Urea. and their commander, Col. Morales was transfered to the General Staff of Santa Anna, who was defeated at San Jacinto later in April. The Postosi troops, not being at San Jacinto, were with General Urea's withdrawl back to Matamoros, Mexico after the Mexican defeat at San Jacinto and the rifle, along with everything else of the officer's baggage, was taken there. The information given me is directly from the family and is being studied by several researchers to find out more information. While the family didn't say the Southwest corner, Their description of attacking the cannon's position on top of a corner where two walls met to the left of the main gate leaves little in the way of other possibilities, especialy in light of the recalling of how the troops then opened the gate from within. This is all historicaly documented as occuring at the Southwest corner. THis cannon, by the way, was the one fired by Col. Travis in response to the demands of the Mexicans to surrender. One other item of historical significance that is related to the rifle has been sent to me by the family. They didn't want anything for it but insisted that it should remain withthe rifle because of it's association. It's a soft leather pouch that contains a peice of material with some sewing on it from a little girl. The sewing is dated 1834 when she was seven years old. I don't think that I should be selling the rifle Gunny. There is still too much research to be done on all of this. In addition, I'd never again be fortunate enough to come upon another such relic from the historic battle. I can tell you though that the rifle has been fired by myself and a friend with a .380 ball and a patch. The rifle is probably a .395 caliber at the grooves. making it officialy a .40 caliber rifle. Isn't this neat? I wonder what else is still out there to be discovered in some closet or shed in Mexico? I'll be posting the photo's of the leather bag and the sewing ion the
Alamo Movie Forum site soon and so should also post them here as well for anyone interested in seeing them. Thanks for the interest Gunny! Contact me any time to discuss this rifle. Fred Gaarde,
bshiplar1@aol.com