Beagle wrote:Schoch is a respected geologist by any standard. IMO, he has been correct (given the info. that is available to him) in everything that he has done.
Slowly, grudgingly, most scientists agree with his Sphinx findings.
But because he flips off the "club" he is very disliked. All the rhetoric coming now is because many folks are fearful that he may give some credence to the Bosnia excavation.
The example of many folks now attacking his "girlfriend" is what I mean about "clutching at straws".
Hell, even Oz' wife hasn't been attacked. So, nothing more to say until he's done there. He arrives tomorrow.
Can you name any geologists who actually agree with him? I can name 2
that think the Sphinx is older than the conventional dating but don't accept his dates, and several who flatly disagree and think the conventional dating is correct.
His girl friend calls them 'so called geologists'. It's probably that sort of comment that leads to criticisms of her. And of course her New Age leanings.
what are their names please and do you have any links to their work?
His girl friend calls them 'so called geologists'. It's probably that sort of comment that leads to criticisms of her. And of course her New Age leanings.
who would care what she thinks anyways?
Momma always taught me it was more polite to say "you're being naive" than "BULLSHIT!!!!"
no apparently they were based on photonic travel
so maybe the water was for making drinks ?
the most advanced drink system on earth right now is soda stream iirc
that requires water
maybe they were making intergalactic space juice (believe it or not it is a soda stream flavour, it also turns your shit green)
oh wait,isn't this whole site being subject to that type of archeology
you are the only one here that thinks that
you are the only one here who has faith
now there is some kind of connection here that i just can't put my finger on
I could not find more information about it, but it seems that a team of pedologists (from a "Institute for Agro-Pedology) has studied the soil and humus on the hills, and found that its thickness could match with an age of more or less 5700 years. This info was released by Dnevni Avaz, but I have no link since Avaz on line doesn't stock the news for more than 2 or 3 days. It is mentionned, with no details, here : http://r.bloger.hr/post/prilag.....46956.aspx.
However, this datation does not please M. Osmanagic : he talked about it to RTV Visoko : http://www.rtv-visoko.ba/news.php?readmore=80. He says roughly that the result given by the people of the Institute is partial, that it concerns only one place, that in some place the thickness of humus is 1,20 m, and that all the specimen have an equal importance. He adds that other analysis will be made, independently from each other, in Bosnia, Italia and Slovenia. No mention of this datation on the official website.
Seems that all the good info any more is on the Bosnia Pyramid forum.
Question: does this quote seem to be saying that 5700 yrs. ago there was NO soil and humus on the hill?
