Giza
Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters
GV
I have looked at millers Idea for the celtic cross before and though great claims are made there are many discrepancies.
All true celtic crosses found have been dated AD
No celtic cross has ever been found with degree markings
There are no written references to using the celtic cross as a navigational aid
No celtic cross was ever found with a plumb line attached or residue of such or even any cross with any means to attach such
The proposed egyptian cross takes a lot of imagination to even resemble the celtic cross .
If you have any factual evidence to the contary I would be very interested.
I have looked at millers Idea for the celtic cross before and though great claims are made there are many discrepancies.
All true celtic crosses found have been dated AD
No celtic cross has ever been found with degree markings
There are no written references to using the celtic cross as a navigational aid
No celtic cross was ever found with a plumb line attached or residue of such or even any cross with any means to attach such
The proposed egyptian cross takes a lot of imagination to even resemble the celtic cross .
If you have any factual evidence to the contary I would be very interested.
Hello Tech - here's hoping you don't respond to this post. We really need to stop "feeding" these people. To respond is futile, and a measure of success for them.
Whether you agree or disagree is of no consequence to them. Simply responding IS.
What would they do if nobody would talk to them?
VG would talk to Marduk for a while (wake up folks) and Arch would throw a big fit for a while.
Then they would go away.
Whether you agree or disagree is of no consequence to them. Simply responding IS.
What would they do if nobody would talk to them?
VG would talk to Marduk for a while (wake up folks) and Arch would throw a big fit for a while.
Then they would go away.
- oldarchystudent
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:34 am
- Location: Canada
I know you shouldn't feed trolls, but it's so much fun! You are right though....Beagle wrote:Hello Tech - here's hoping you don't respond to this post. We really need to stop "feeding" these people. To respond is futile, and a measure of success for them.
Whether you agree or disagree is of no consequence to them. Simply responding IS.
What would they do if nobody would talk to them?
VG would talk to Marduk for a while (wake up folks) and Arch would throw a big fit for a while.
Then they would go away.
Hello OAS - welcome. I see that you have been here for one day and have been engaged in the religious discussions completely.
Sorry to see that. This is, despite the obvious problems, an archaeology forum. According to Google, there are 45 MILLION bible forums.
So there is sumpin' weird going on around here.
How long have you been posting? Only Archaeology? Anyway - welcome
Sorry to see that. This is, despite the obvious problems, an archaeology forum. According to Google, there are 45 MILLION bible forums.
So there is sumpin' weird going on around here.
How long have you been posting? Only Archaeology? Anyway - welcome

- oldarchystudent
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:34 am
- Location: Canada
I joined the discussion group yesterday. I've been pretty active since then, but in a lot of discussions that really don't have much to do with real archaeology. Pretty much any open archaeology forum I've seen has had a couple of fundamentalists trying to highjack the whole thing, so it's a normal day I guess. Great site!Beagle wrote:Hello OAS - welcome. I see that you have been here for one day and have been engaged in the religious discussions completely.
Sorry to see that. This is, despite the obvious problems, an archaeology forum. According to Google, there are 45 MILLION bible forums.
So there is sumpin' weird going on around here.
How long have you been posting? Only Archaeology? Anyway - welcome