Marduks movie corner

[marduk]

theres another lie then
you havent provided proof at all
or you'd be able to link to it
all you have is a letter from Dr Winters where he says that in his opinion mesoamerican monuments are genuine
want me to post his scholarly articale again where he states that clearly the writing is backwards and written back to front making it unlike any genuine work of sumerian writing ever found

you're making yourself a laughing stock with these claims
the funny thing
is that you don't even notice
by the way that last post of yours was your seventh personal attack in a row. get to ten and I will withdraw my offer

I'm hoping you do
i really am

[Beagle]

You've lost your reading comprehension again. You clearly don't underatand that at all. That link you're talking about? I posted it a long time ago in the Pokotia thread.

Can't remember, can you?

[marduk]

no you posted your opinion of what it meant
nobody backed you and I have since proved that in fact you had just misread it
thats 8 by the way

[Beagle]

I better make it clear to you that I don't give a damn about any offer.
I've already told you how we can have peace on this board.

You better go back and re-read the Pokotia thread.

Now it's 10 PM where you're at. If you must post again, make it nice. If it is I'll let it stand.

[marduk]

who died and put you in charge of anything Beagle
I have read the pokotia thread
looks like someone got proven a liar right here on page three
http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewt ... c&start=30
oh look
its you
you were proven a liar again in this thread when you claimed that I had lied about what i posted on celts
even Forum Monk pointed that out to you
another lie you told was saying that you had evidence that I had lied
which you still havent posted
thats three lies on your part
you think anyone believes youre a nice guy
or that anyone considers you honest
laughable
you really are
thats 9 by the way

[Nebankh]

It's time you guys stopped for one of DCI Gene Hunt's intermission ice creams.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwlnVo1Toj8

[Beagle]

these panels have proto-Sumerian symbols mixed with the cuneiform symbols.

Secondly, whereas, the wedges of most Sumerian cuneiform text point

leftward, the wedges of the Fuente cuneiform signs point rightward.

From my link on page 5 of the Pokotia thread. Honestly Marduk, you're just stupid.

[marduk]

and you are posting only half the truth
heres what he actually said

Commentary
The cuneiform writing was interesting for two reasons. First, we find that
these panels have proto-Sumerian symbols mixed with the cuneiform symbols. Secondly, whereas, the wedges of most Sumerian cuneiform text point leftward, the wedges of the Fuente cuneiform signs point rightward. This may result from the fact that in the Fuente text , the letters are read from right to left, instead of left to right like the cuneiform text from Mesopotamia.
The passage on the cuneiform panels of the Fuente Bowl seems to be very similar to the Proto-Sumerian inscription on the right side of the bowl. This translation makes it clear that the passage complements my earlier decipherment of the Proto-Sumerian text also found on the left side of the Fuente Bowl.

now you can tell me what if any of that suggests that he thinks its genuine ?
because if you can't
then you're a liar

[Beagle]

You're skipping the part about where you were wrong. I did post the link.
You said I didn't.
Getting weasely again.

[marduk]

I havent been wrong at any time
I said that he didnt think they were genuine
he says that its written back to front
is this difficult for you Beagle

you seem to be stuck on this
other people have told you to get over yourself because you were wrong
I don't hear anyone telling me that ?

so
prove that Clyde thinks the fuente magna is genuine
or you're a liar
its as simple as that
why dont you mail him again and ask him directly
I already know what hes going to say

still
be a laugh seeing you attempt to misconstrue what he says again with your limited understanding of this area
last time you thought the fuente magna libation bowl was a monument
think you can do better this time ?
please be my guest

[Beagle]

You've lost your reading comprehension again. You clearly don't underatand that at all. That link you're talking about? I posted it a long time ago in the Pokotia thread.

Can't remember, can you?

no you posted your opinion of what it meant
nobody backed you and I have since proved that in fact you had just misread it
thats 8 by the way

You're very clearly wrong.

[marduk]

the evidence that you have failed to understand says otherwise

[Beagle]

Normal people read this Marduk. They're seeing you lie again. Before, you were just wrong. Trying to cover up and denying it is lying. That's what you're doing again.

[marduk]

laughable
now youre really clutching at straws
ive had three pms about this pokotia evidence asking me why you consistently fail to see whats right in front of your face
youre in a minority of one again
even Clyde made a fool of you
wake up and smell the coffee
you've been proven a lia three times in this thread
everyone reading thsi thread will have seen it
you think by the time they get to the rubbish your posting now they'll even bother to read it
laughable

[Beagle]

Reread your post Marduk. Can't you see that you're losing it.
A smart person would have taken the offer to have the last word, but nicely.

You can't help yourself can you.
I believe you about getting pmails. That's not what they said though.
You know that.