kbs2244 wrote:
E.P.
This will be my last post on the subject.
Well that is some good news. I have had a stroke, and typing is difficult.
kbs2244 wrote:We will have to agree to disagree. For whatever reasons you are in love with the current Indian organizations and do not see them as an obstruction to discovery. I do.
kb, I don't think I explained to you how I ended up with my stroke - it was due to diabetes, which runs in my family, due to Native American heritage. I am in fact 1/8 Shawnee, enough for diabetes and stroke, but not enough for the casino.
"love" is not the correct word; Native Americans and people of heritage are just trying to work their way through, sometimes in what I may view as good ways, and sometimes not. But these are not my decisions, and since my stroke I am particularly reluctant to comment on the decisions of others.
But your mistakes are so obvious, as we have seen them made by others, and so outrageous, that I am undertaking the effort to type this reply.
Let's start at the top - stop using the word "Indian". It confuses my friends from Bombay and Dehli. The keep showing up at powwows looking for a good curry and are alarmed to find buffalo on the grill.
Since you seem oblivious to spiritual matters, and I am not your spiritual guide, let me see if I can explain a part of this problem to you in terms you'll understand. I am thinking of forming the Native American archaeological association. The plan is to dig up Andrew Jackson and George Washington's graves to examine their remains for signs of venereal disease; advanced syphilis may provide explanation for their cruelty.
kbs2244 wrote:
To take on your last point first. I have read your expose. All 130 pages of it. I found it interesting and informative. Although I recognized some of the names in it, I am not a follower of any of the people you mention in it. I have not been “misled” by any of them. I am not a Nazi, a member of the KKK, a believer in Edgar Cayce, belong to any “secrete cults,” etc.
Well that's some good news - you had Sam and myself convinced that you were an insane dimwit racist neo-Nazi, so you'd fit right.
kbs2244 wrote:
I just want any and all backed up scientific discoveries made known to the general public. After your career, I would expect you to be agreement with that desire.
Agree completely. But in my view human remains should only be handled by those capable of treating them with competence and respect. Most Native Americans hold as a religious belief that disturbing human remains causes the spirit of their owner to return until the disturbance is ended. You don't have to believe this, it is merely that if you respect the beliefs of others on a very important matter to them it shows that you show some respect for others.
I think of this in terms of autopsies, and if you're not capable of carrying out an autopsy after several millenia, if you're not competent, you shouldn't be doing it. I don't think a necessary autopsy is disturbing or disrespectful, but that is just my opinion - others differ, and I can only stress the needs of the living to them.
From what I know of DNA testing, it is my thinking that DNA testing can always be done, as it is non-destructive. Thus the data can be gathered, and the samples of the remains that that data was gathered from then handled appropriately. But that is just my opinion.
kbs2244 wrote:
This is a map of Canada Casino locations. The US map is even more frightening. It has gotten to the point that the prairie cities of Canada are fighting to get casino. This has nothing to do with treaties. Most of these are “off reservation” locations. They can be built only because of the Indians favored status as owners. They are chasing the tourist dollar. Indian casinos are big bucks in both the US and Canada.
http://www.worldcasinodirectory.com/canada-casinos/map
It is true the peoples will use casino money and power to stop what they view as the disrespectful treatment of human remains, whether of their own people or another people.
kbs2244 wrote:
Your listed site was at the Royal Alberta Museum. The Royal Alberta Museum is government supported. The administrators have to walk a fine line between science and what is “Politically Correct.” The casinos bring in big tax money. They are not taxed directly, but the auxiliary hotels, restaurants, road construction, etc is.
As someone much smarter than me said “The love of money is root of evil.”
Perhaps the Royal Alberta Museum people are just showing normal human decency and respect, which appear to be things that either you don't understand or you don't think the first peoples deserve.
kbs2244 wrote:
Now as far as who built the wheels, I will repeat, I have no idea.
Yes you do, you just won't say it, because there are many who could shoot down your hypothesis in a minute:
I have no problem with Ainu related early people on the Pacific coast. Nor do I have any problem with the necessary proper studies of the remains by those qualified. If they're Ainu related, then perhaps Ainu elders should be called in for advice on their handling.
But when you move those people well inland, point to non-Ainu cultural features and claim them as Ainu, ignore DNA evidence showing those people not to be Ainu related, and finally ignore both Siouxian history and other peoples accounts of the early Siouxian peoples at contact, then don't be surprised if some people think you're a racist idiot. It seems a rational deduction to them based on the evidence you provide them with.
kbs2244 wrote:
You mentioned the “pre-Clovis” debate. It is just over the heads of the general public and again the Indians can afford to ignore it. If it ever gets to be front page news, and they haven’t changed their tactics, it will get their attention.
The pre-Clovis debate has already been front page news, kb, but guess what, in southern North America the people are C DNA and savanah river DNA, and maybe B and D, NOT your Ainu descendants. That's the facts.
kbs2244 wrote:
I will repeat that I have nothing against the Indians as a people or a culture. What they did when they moved into an area isn’t anything different then has been done around the world. You mention their migrations and movements in your book about impacts in the western hemisphere. All that research should have told you they were not what they now claim.
kb, you have poor reading and comprehension skills. The stunning finding of my book is that they were exactly what they claimed, despite the attempts of some racist idiots to create imaginary histories for them. In other words, the peoples' traditions and the archaeological record lock.
The key to that lock was the impact events. That's the hard fact.
kbs2244 wrote:And that misleading of the public is what I object to.
That's what Sam and I object to as well.
kbs2244 wrote:I think they made a huge strategy error when they picked being first as their reason to be favored. And I object to their tactics in defending that error.
"Favored"? "Error"?
kb, before you comment again, please take a few minutes to consider that as little as 140,000 years may be all that separates you from the reddest "Indian", or the blackest African, or the "yellowest" Oriental. Others would place the time span at even less than that, only 70,000 years or so.
This has been very difficult for me, and despite some of my harsh words, I really do hope that in the end my words here bring you some peace. Since this is the end of this matter, please take a moment to consider that perhaps your anger has another source or reason, one having nothing to do with Native Americans or archaeology.
E.P. Grondine
Man and Impact in the Americas