PPN notes
Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16014
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
Re: PPN notes
And of course there is no reason to assume that then, as now, the larger, more prosperous and populous towns were closer to the sea. Mankind has always had an affinity for the sea.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin
Re: PPN notes
Gobekli Tepe news letter:
https://www.academia.edu/6280624/G%C3%B ... etter_2014
For the production and use of beer in Egypt in a religious festival see:
http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/ccc/ce102103.html
For relations between Egypt and Byblos, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byblos
and the Thoth lore
https://www.academia.edu/6280624/G%C3%B ... etter_2014
For the production and use of beer in Egypt in a religious festival see:
http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/ccc/ce102103.html
For relations between Egypt and Byblos, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byblos
and the Thoth lore
Re: PPN notes
X mt DNA shows up again:
https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot ... VZKCZgh.97
And where the hell is the original discussion: "Was Gobekli Tepe a henge?"
https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot ... VZKCZgh.97
And where the hell is the original discussion: "Was Gobekli Tepe a henge?"
Re: PPN notes
The El Portalon results are hardly new ,and it's not particularly surprising to find mt DNA X present .
There never was a discussion "Was Gobekli Tepe a henge?" . It clearly wasn't . Only you could manage to think it that it was . Read the literature , the excavation reports etc , nobody who knows anything about the site ever suggested that it was .
You did however ask that question about 3 years ago .
There never was a discussion "Was Gobekli Tepe a henge?" . It clearly wasn't . Only you could manage to think it that it was . Read the literature , the excavation reports etc , nobody who knows anything about the site ever suggested that it was .
You did however ask that question about 3 years ago .
Re: PPN notes
Three years, and we still can not agree on the definition of "henge".
Nor can we agree to let the matter rest.
Nor can we agree to let the matter rest.
Re: PPN notes
It is not 3 years ,it's 'closer to 8 . You have been told this many times too , does nothing stick ?E.P. Grondine wrote:Three years, and we still can not agree on the definition of "henge".
Nor can we agree to let the matter rest.
It is not a disagreement , there is a proper definition of the term that is accepted worldwide including America by people who know about the subject .
The proper definition with multiple separate links , is nothing like the two you made up . In contrast to the multiple links highlighting where you get it wrong ,you have never supplied any supporting evidence to show that anyone with any knowledge about the subject agrees with your definition .
You won't let the matter rest and accept your error . I just keep replying to your crap .
- circumspice
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:10 pm
Re: PPN notes
This particular article makes no mention of any haplogroup whatsoever, be it from mtDNA, Y-DNA or autosomal DNA. Where the hell do you come up with these ideas of yours EP???E.P. Grondine wrote:X mt DNA shows up again:
https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot ... VZKCZgh.97
And where the hell is the original discussion: "Was Gobekli Tepe a henge?"
"Nothing discloses real character like the use of power. It is easy for the weak to be gentle. Most people can bear adversity. But if you wish to know what a man really is, give him power. This is the supreme test." ~ Robert G. Ingersoll
"Damn with faint praise, assent with civil leer, and, without sneering, teach the rest to sneer." ~ Alexander Pope
"Damn with faint praise, assent with civil leer, and, without sneering, teach the rest to sneer." ~ Alexander Pope
Re: PPN notes
That's what I was referring to in "The El Portalon results are hardly new ,and it's not particularly surprising to find mt DNA X present . ".E.P. Grondine wrote:Wrong link. Here it is, in all its detail:
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2018/03/06/1717762115