Tiompan wrote:Ancient sky magic ? Lol .
Grown ups don't simply say something is wrong , they point out why it is wrong .
When you are not making errors ,you are making unsupportable claims .
How many times have you been asked to provide evidence to support your claims and failed to do so ?
Yet again "If there is anything that you could quote where I have said something that might be wrong , related to the subject , do mention it . As ever breath will not be held ."
Fair enough.
Let us take the "experts" of the entire self proclaimed field of archaeo-astronomy as it now sits.
(and I exclude experts on ancient cuneiform and hieroglyphic records from this.)
They have absolutely no explanation for the amount of resources spent by ancient man for sky magic,
nor any explanation for the bizarre practices of ancient sky magic.
Whereas those who are working with recent asteroid and comet impacts do.
So what will happen is that the previous and current work will be absorbed into the new paradigm of "archaeo-astronomy".
Now just because you personally are incapable of perceiving the geological data of recent impacts
does not mean that everyone is.
Your deficits in this regard are well documented, as are your rationalizations to avoid dealing with that hard geological data.