Page 96 of 111
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:54 pm
by Guest
You'll need to read my ebook for the particulars of the Global Flood Model, I'm not going to write the book again for you, or you can read the articles at my website, that should clue you in.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:55 pm
by Guest
Genesis Veracity wrote:You'll need to read my ebook for the particulars of the Global Flood Model, I'm not going to write the book again for you, or you can read the articles at my website, that should clue you in.
Cowardice and evasion noted.
--J.D.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:56 pm
by Guest
Doctor X, you don't even understand the Global Flood Model, and yet, you pretend that you do, so why don't you "get it" first, then try to punch holes in it, otherwise, you look quite foolish.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:57 pm
by Guest
Doctor X, how many comic books do you subscribe to?
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:58 pm
by ed
The energy. I don't care about the model, I want to know about the energy.
If you have done your homework you have thought of this and have the answer. If you haven't, you have no model.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:00 pm
by Guest
Genesis Veracity wrote:Doctor X, you don't even understand the Global Flood Model, . . .
Ipse dixit, but incorrect.
Show where the calculations are wrong.
Do you
contradict BOTH Flood Myths? Who are
you to contradict YHWH and the Elohim?!!
I will pray for you. . .
Blathers on hypocritically
Well, you have added
Hypocrite to your titles. Care to go for the "trifecta of dishonor?"
--J.D.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:05 pm
by Guest
Genesis Veracity wrote:Doctor X, how many comic books do you subscribe to?
Why? Are you trying to improve your reading comprehension?
一番馬鹿ですねえ!
--J.D.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:07 pm
by ed
ed wrote:The energy. I don't care about the model, I want to know about the energy.
If you have done your homework you have thought of this and have the answer. If you haven't, you have no model.
It seems that you are proposing ongoing magnitude 9-10? (which is it?) earthquakes worldwide for some period of time. And not locally, across every plate boundry. What are the implications of this?
We will discuss floating on a boat during all this nastiness at a later date.
I gotta ask. Who is your publisher? I somehow suspect that it is not Wiley Interscience.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:09 pm
by Guest
ed wrote:We will discuss floating on a boat during all this nastiness at a later date.
Particularly under 2,000+ PSI. Makes shoveling all of the shit a bit "difficult."
I gotta ask. Who is your publisher? I somehow suspect that it is not Wiley Interscience.
"Vanity, all is vanity."
--J.D.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:09 pm
by Guest
Last time I checked, earthquakes don't cause a meltdown of near surface crust, so what is your point?
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:12 pm
by Guest
--J.D.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:12 pm
by ed
Genesis Veracity wrote:Last time I checked, earthquakes don't cause a meltdown of near surface crust, so what is your point?
Didn't say they did.
The energy man, the energy. How much? What happens? Surely you are not just now thinking about it?
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:13 pm
by Guest
. . . and the water . . . do not forget the volume of water . . . I hear tell it is "important" in the Flood Myths.
--J.D.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:13 pm
by Guest
Oh great Grasshopper, what riddle are you posing?
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:15 pm
by ed
Genesis Veracity wrote:Doctor X, magma is about 70% water by weight, hello?
Lets not forget this. A reference if you please?