Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:06 pm
No, that's not "the deal."
Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
Argumentum ad ignorantiam.Genesis Veracity wrote:Ed, if you will understand the GFM, then you can run your own calculations to see if the scenario is falsifiable, have fun.
FaaaaaTALITY!ed wrote:If I thought that you knew anything about science and were engaged in anything other than advocacy "research" I might take you up on that. As it is it is clear to me (and I suspect everyone reading this) that for some odd reason you will lie and distort and mislead to support a mythic structure that you subscribe to. Whether one is dealing with a new age nut, a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, a ley line afficianado, a flat earther or a bible literalist or fundimentalist moslem facts are meaningless. They will commit intellectual outrages to advance their beliefs. The fact that you cannot answer a very simple question that follows ineluctably from your contentions suggests that you are simply preaching and that is worth exactly zero.
We may have to conduct another poll on Official Village Idiot, yes.archaeologist wrote:it is so nice to see a new enemy #1. i am not impressed that he cannot back up his statements.
He's a wackey guy.archaeologist wrote:it is so nice to see a new enemy #1. i am not impressed that he cannot back up his statements.
He . . . reads . . . like . . . He Whose Name Must Not be Written!!!! [!--Ed.]ed wrote:didn't he say something about atlantis too?
Yeah. Thought of that.Doctor X wrote:He . . . reads . . . like . . . He Whose Name Must Not be Written!!!! [!--Ed.]ed wrote:didn't he say something about atlantis too?
--J.D.
We must work diligently to prevent this from happening.Doctor X wrote:The sudden density of stupidity would cause the universe to collapse into a singularity! The Universe as We Know it [TUAWKI--Ed.] has not been in this much danger since it looked like the Cubs would play the Red Sox for the 2003 World Series.
--J.D.
archaeologist wrote:it is so nice to see a new enemy #1. i am not impressed that he cannot back up his statements.
Not . . . that there is anything wrong with that. . . .Minimalist wrote:archaeologist wrote:it is so nice to see a new enemy #1. i am not impressed that he cannot back up his statements.
Kind of makes you two of a kind, no?