Staggering Breakthrough

Random older topics of discussion

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

User avatar
Charlie Hatchett
Posts: 2274
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:58 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Post by Charlie Hatchett »

Minimalist wrote:
Forum Monk wrote:Can I have a drumstick?
:lol:

If you can wrestle it into the oven you can have whatever you like.
:P

Here, I pass the honorary torch back to you:

Image
Charlie Hatchett

PreClovis Artifacts from Central Texas
www.preclovis.com
http://forum.preclovis.com
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Minimalist »

but what sequences we got support that idea."

I interpret that as a call for more people to begin research along these lines.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Post by Digit »

And this gives the chance to raise a point I was hoping somebody might clarify for me.
In this country if you tread on a policeman's foot they take a DNA sample for future reference, if then a sample from a crime scene matches, you become a guest of Her Majesty. Problem, the normal technique applied relies on the matching of 7 points. This low number has resulted in thousands of samples having to be ignored as apparently instead of the chance match running into millions it actually comes down to 1 in 35!
Sooo! When the experts are looking for matches to prove dino/bird HSN/HSS relationships or otherwise, how far do they go?
Forum Monk
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: USA

Post by Forum Monk »

Based on that depth of analysis you suggest, Digit, stegasaurus could be laying on the ground with a gaping hole in his belly and they would indict the turkey.
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Post by Digit »

I don't get that Monk! What I was trying to point out was that the full DNA for a Wood Pigeon would probably be unmatched by any other Wood Pigeon. So given 2 samples, without ID, how many matches would be rquired for the lab tech to swear that both samples came from Wood Pigeons?
Locked