Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:40 pm
You could probably open up the discussion a little more if you would explain why you feel that way.Knuckle sandwhich wrote:Dang, that article was tooth-grindingly awful for a lot of reasons.
Archaeologica.org
Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
BC Natives Were Farmers as Well as Hunters/Fishers/Gatherers
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:52 pm
Well I thought about that at first, and then realized I'd wind up typing for the next hour and a half if I did.
Anyway, there's a lot of info out there on wapato and it's use.
Anyway, there's a lot of info out there on wapato and it's use.
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:06 pm
Ok - let me repost the link since Sam's post didn't work.
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/20615209.html
I really know nothing about it.
Maybe someone else does.
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/20615209.html
I really know nothing about it.
Maybe someone else does.
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:17 pm
Wapato is super common on the lower Columbia River and in the lakes and sloughs around there. It also occurs up in BC in several localized areas IIRC. For people who eat largely meat and some fruit and vegetal matter, a good dose of starchy carbs is just what the doctor ordered. People really crave it.
Wapato tastes just like a potato, it is a step above camas on the coolness factor because it does not need to be cooked prior to eating it. It is easy to harvest, and the more people harvest it, the more it spreads. After the advent of food storage in this area, wapato proved a great asset to people who lived where it occurs, it stores well in underground caches for months on end, and it became a sought after trade good (mostly post-dating the BC site the article talks about). It does occur in sites prior to that though, some of the older examples go back some 6,000 years IIRC (it's been awhile).
The statements of farming at 3,500 BP, amazement at finding wapato at the site, etc. are just sensationalist crap. But then almost every news article on archaeology is these days, between the archaeologists (they don't even sound like archaeologists in this case) quoted and the journalists they just get way out of whack.
Wapato tastes just like a potato, it is a step above camas on the coolness factor because it does not need to be cooked prior to eating it. It is easy to harvest, and the more people harvest it, the more it spreads. After the advent of food storage in this area, wapato proved a great asset to people who lived where it occurs, it stores well in underground caches for months on end, and it became a sought after trade good (mostly post-dating the BC site the article talks about). It does occur in sites prior to that though, some of the older examples go back some 6,000 years IIRC (it's been awhile).
The statements of farming at 3,500 BP, amazement at finding wapato at the site, etc. are just sensationalist crap. But then almost every news article on archaeology is these days, between the archaeologists (they don't even sound like archaeologists in this case) quoted and the journalists they just get way out of whack.