Polar Bears.

Here's where you get off topic and off center....Keep it nice, keep it clean, no sniping, no flaming. After that, anything goes.

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by Minimalist »

and don't ask me how they managed it

I'll bet the shepherd was on top.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
uniface

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by uniface »

"Love will find a way," as they say. :mrgreen:
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by Digit »

Sod off Min, dump your own rubbish! :lol:
Clearly a hybrid of two distinct species
According to the Kennel Club ALL dogs are the same species.

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by Minimalist »

Yes. A good example of "artificial selection" according to Richard Dawkins.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by Digit »

That's a new definition to me Min, accurate as well.

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16036
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by Minimalist »

Artificial selection (or selective breeding) describes intentional breeding for certain traits, or combination of traits.The term was utilized by Charles Darwin in contrast to natural selection, in which the differential reproduction of organisms with certain traits is attributed to improved survival or reproductive ability (“Darwinian fitness”). As opposed to artificial selection, in which humans favor specific traits, in natural selection the environment acts as a sieve through which only certain variations can pass.


From Wiki
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
User avatar
circumspice
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:10 pm

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by circumspice »

Minimalist wrote:
Species! Are Great Danes abd Chihuahua different species? Genetically no. HSN HSS? Pass

I got into that discussion on another board some time ago with a guy who was insisting that the skeletal differences between HNS and HSS 'proved' they were different species. I asked one innocent question. "What skeletal differences are those? YOu mean like the differences between modern Watusi and Inuit?"

And the battle was on!



And if you want to send expendable politicians then we have a whole party full of them!


Please! Send them ALL! Send the lobbyists and lawyers, too!!! :lol:
"Nothing discloses real character like the use of power. It is easy for the weak to be gentle. Most people can bear adversity. But if you wish to know what a man really is, give him power. This is the supreme test." ~ Robert G. Ingersoll

"Damn with faint praise, assent with civil leer, and, without sneering, teach the rest to sneer." ~ Alexander Pope
uniface

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by uniface »

According to the Kennel Club ALL dogs are the same species.
This is tap-dancing around the term species to avoid having to use it. A circumlocutionary euphamism at best.
artificial selection
As if how they got there outweighed that fact of what they are now.
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by Digit »

I used the word species, I see no reason not to...
As if how they got there outweighed that fact of what they are now.
...and that I don't understand.

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
uniface

Re: Polar Bears.

Post by uniface »

You're right. You did.

I was out to lunch there . . . :oops:
Post Reply