Radiocarbon dating 2.0
Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
What else would we read it for?
Roy.
Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
It means that looking at co-eds' "assets" makes GI Joe get a hard-on, Johnny.Johnny wrote:"The national bosom gives rise to the soldier." WTF is that even supposed to mean?
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
Content :
Accurately drawn-up horoscopes were the most precise and fudge-proof date-fixing records possible previously to the technological advances of the last hundred years or so.
Record the planetary configuration in the heavens at the time a building was completed (as the Egyptians did), use a computer program to run the planetary orbits in reverse, and you can determine their dates, accurate to maybe a two week window.
Doing this comes up with only-possible-dates in the middle ages for "ancient Egyptian" monuments.
That 14C says are 4,500 years old.
A little cognitive dissonance there . . .
Accurately drawn-up horoscopes were the most precise and fudge-proof date-fixing records possible previously to the technological advances of the last hundred years or so.
Record the planetary configuration in the heavens at the time a building was completed (as the Egyptians did), use a computer program to run the planetary orbits in reverse, and you can determine their dates, accurate to maybe a two week window.
Doing this comes up with only-possible-dates in the middle ages for "ancient Egyptian" monuments.
That 14C says are 4,500 years old.
A little cognitive dissonance there . . .
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
How are we to be sure that the "horoscopes" are actually horoscopes ,are accurate and cast for the date of build ?
George
George
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
So Herodotus couldn't have seen them then?Doing this comes up with only-possible-dates in the middle ages for "ancient Egyptian" monuments.
Anyway Uni, you're out by a few thousand years...
http://www.outerworlds.com/likeness/aliens/aliens.html
Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
Herodotus could well have seen them.
The issue is whether he lived in the period Scallager et al. assigned him to, or when he really lived.
As always, it is casual assumptions that bring inquiry to grief.
The issue is whether he lived in the period Scallager et al. assigned him to, or when he really lived.
As always, it is casual assumptions that bring inquiry to grief.
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
Yes indeed. Like assuming that Herodotus lived in the middle ages you mean?it is casual assumptions that bring inquiry to grief.
Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16033
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
So Herodotus couldn't have seen them then?
Herodotus apparently lived in the 18th century. He was a friend of Thomas Paine's!
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
Did he ever visit Egypt do you know?
Roy.
Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
http://revisedhistory.org/manifest-mission.htm
Well I've just read through a lot of this and I found it fascinating!
Quite how they come to the conclusion that the existance of 'nations' leads to wars requires a lot distorted thought though.
Roy.
Well I've just read through a lot of this and I found it fascinating!
Quite how they come to the conclusion that the existance of 'nations' leads to wars requires a lot distorted thought though.
Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
Huh, i thought wars led to nations (or i guess nation-states), not the other way around.Digit wrote:http://revisedhistory.org/manifest-mission.htm
Well I've just read through a lot of this and I found it fascinating!
Quite how they come to the conclusion that the existance of 'nations' leads to wars requires a lot distorted thought though.
Roy.
Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0
"it is casual assumptions that bring inquiry to grief."
"Yes indeed. Like assuming that Herodotus lived in the middle ages you mean?"
You'd kind of have to read the book(s). Writing them is a cottage industry in Russia. Then again, Russia has an educational system that's bent on educating people rather than subverting them.
"Yes indeed. Like assuming that Herodotus lived in the middle ages you mean?"
You'd kind of have to read the book(s). Writing them is a cottage industry in Russia. Then again, Russia has an educational system that's bent on educating people rather than subverting them.