Radiocarbon dating 2.0

The Old World is a reference to those parts of Earth known to Europeans before the voyages of Christopher Columbus; it includes Europe, Asia and Africa.

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by Digit »

What else would we read it for?

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Johnny wrote:"The national bosom gives rise to the soldier." WTF is that even supposed to mean?
It means that looking at co-eds' "assets" makes GI Joe get a hard-on, Johnny.
uniface

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by uniface »

Content :

Accurately drawn-up horoscopes were the most precise and fudge-proof date-fixing records possible previously to the technological advances of the last hundred years or so.

Record the planetary configuration in the heavens at the time a building was completed (as the Egyptians did), use a computer program to run the planetary orbits in reverse, and you can determine their dates, accurate to maybe a two week window.

Doing this comes up with only-possible-dates in the middle ages for "ancient Egyptian" monuments.

That 14C says are 4,500 years old.

A little cognitive dissonance there . . .
Tiompan
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:13 am

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by Tiompan »

How are we to be sure that the "horoscopes" are actually horoscopes ,are accurate and cast for the date of build ?

George
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by Digit »

Doing this comes up with only-possible-dates in the middle ages for "ancient Egyptian" monuments.
So Herodotus couldn't have seen them then?
Anyway Uni, you're out by a few thousand years...

http://www.outerworlds.com/likeness/aliens/aliens.html

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
uniface

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by uniface »

Herodotus could well have seen them.

The issue is whether he lived in the period Scallager et al. assigned him to, or when he really lived.

As always, it is casual assumptions that bring inquiry to grief.
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by Digit »

it is casual assumptions that bring inquiry to grief.
Yes indeed. Like assuming that Herodotus lived in the middle ages you mean?

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16033
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by Minimalist »

So Herodotus couldn't have seen them then?

Herodotus apparently lived in the 18th century. He was a friend of Thomas Paine's!
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by Digit »

Did he ever visit Egypt do you know?

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by Digit »

http://revisedhistory.org/manifest-mission.htm

Well I've just read through a lot of this and I found it fascinating!
Quite how they come to the conclusion that the existance of 'nations' leads to wars requires a lot distorted thought though.

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
dannan14
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by dannan14 »

Digit wrote:http://revisedhistory.org/manifest-mission.htm

Well I've just read through a lot of this and I found it fascinating!
Quite how they come to the conclusion that the existance of 'nations' leads to wars requires a lot distorted thought though.

Roy.
Huh, i thought wars led to nations (or i guess nation-states), not the other way around.
uniface

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by uniface »

Did he ever visit Egypt do you know?
Never asked him :lol:
uniface

Re: Radiocarbon dating 2.0

Post by uniface »

"it is casual assumptions that bring inquiry to grief."

"Yes indeed. Like assuming that Herodotus lived in the middle ages you mean?"

You'd kind of have to read the book(s). Writing them is a cottage industry in Russia. Then again, Russia has an educational system that's bent on educating people rather than subverting them.
Post Reply