Page 2 of 2
Re: Roman Nanotechnology
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 4:24 pm
by Minimalist
But anybody who could sound the words out, one syllable at a time, could manage that.
I can sound out the syllables in Latin and even Greek..... but I don't know wtf I'm reading for the most part.
Functional illiteracy is reading and writing skills that are inadequate "to manage daily living and employment tasks that require reading skills beyond a basic level."[1] Functional illiteracy is contrasted with illiteracy in the strict sense, meaning the inability to read or write simple sentences in any language.
A functional illiterate could read a Stop Sign....but he couldn't read the owner's manual that came with his car.
Re: Roman Nanotechnology
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 6:50 pm
by uniface
OK. But those were reasonably phonetic languages. We aren't talking about English here, where GHOTI = "fish" (
enouGH) + (
wO
men) + (
naTI
on)
Reasonable languages sound like they look.

Re: Roman Nanotechnology
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:17 am
by Minimalist
It could be worse. You could be reading hebrew or arabic without vowels....just little dots and dashes all over the page!
Re: Roman Nanotechnology
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:44 am
by kbs2244
I cannot spell worth a dam(?)
One of the greatest moments in my life is when I learned that the rule for abbreviations in English was to drop the vowels.
Until the invention of word processors, I abbreviated a lot.
It isn’t hard to get the meaning if you take in the context.
But then, how to lead someone to the lead mine can be difficult.
Re: Roman Nanotechnology
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:34 pm
by Minimalist
It isn’t hard to get the meaning if you take in the context.
But the context can be a bitch when there are no capitals or even spaces between words.
Even the Greeks were a pain in the ass about that.
