Re: This is Us
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 1:42 pm
I told you that Uni's misogynistic rant was forthcoming... He just waited a few days & posted it on an entirely different thread to confuse the issue.
See below:
Re: Flush Another Theory
by uniface » 08 Apr 2016, 12:02
As do I. Keep the ball rolling, Swanz.
Looks like one arrives as another departs:
Michelle Hilling wrote:It means it is for general topics that don't fit in other threads, not a promotional board for conspiracy and crackpot crap. Of which I am getting fed up with.
The bigger deal people make out of "Inclusion," the tighter the restrictions become for admission to the Diversity Tent, with shared beliefs being the criterion. IOW, we are witnessing -- here and everywhere -- a full-blown return to the Religious dogmatism of the 16th-19th centuries.
Try this, ladies (benefit of the doubt on that fully extended) :
"WE don't believe that. Therefore it is wrong. And you are annoying us by posting information which, if it were rationally considered, would undermine the comfort we derive from unanimity. You can, therefore, only be in the service of EVIL."
As for you, Min, I found your soul brother in an article about the Panama Papers:
I don't know what the document says and it doesn't matter what the document says. That document may be superseded. I don't know what that document means, and I don't know where you got it. And it doesn't mean anything. -- New York lawyer Richard Golub
uniface 1331 13 Sep 2009, 12:21 Pennsylvania
See below:
Re: Flush Another Theory
by uniface » 08 Apr 2016, 12:02
As do I. Keep the ball rolling, Swanz.
Looks like one arrives as another departs:
Michelle Hilling wrote:It means it is for general topics that don't fit in other threads, not a promotional board for conspiracy and crackpot crap. Of which I am getting fed up with.
The bigger deal people make out of "Inclusion," the tighter the restrictions become for admission to the Diversity Tent, with shared beliefs being the criterion. IOW, we are witnessing -- here and everywhere -- a full-blown return to the Religious dogmatism of the 16th-19th centuries.
Try this, ladies (benefit of the doubt on that fully extended) :
"WE don't believe that. Therefore it is wrong. And you are annoying us by posting information which, if it were rationally considered, would undermine the comfort we derive from unanimity. You can, therefore, only be in the service of EVIL."
As for you, Min, I found your soul brother in an article about the Panama Papers:
I don't know what the document says and it doesn't matter what the document says. That document may be superseded. I don't know what that document means, and I don't know where you got it. And it doesn't mean anything. -- New York lawyer Richard Golub
uniface 1331 13 Sep 2009, 12:21 Pennsylvania
