Archaeologica.org

"...Around 12,800 years ago, a sudden, catastrophic event plunged much of the Earth into a period of cold climatic conditions and drought. This drastic climate change-the Younger Dryas-coincided with the extinction of Pleistocene megafauna, such as the saber-tooth cats and the mastodon, and resulted in major declines in prehistoric human populations...",

"...a study published in The Journal of Geology, an international group of scientists analyzing existing and new evidence have determined a cosmic impact event...to be the only plausible hypothesis to explain all the unusual occurrences at the onset of the Younger Dryas period..."

"...Researchers from 21 universities in 6 countries believe the key to the mystery of the Big Freeze lies in nanodiamonds scattered across Europe, North America, and portions of South America, in a 50-million-square-kilometer area known as the Younger Dryas Boundary (YDB) field..."

"...Microscopic nanodiamonds, melt-glass, carbon spherules, and other high-temperature materials are found in abundance throughout the YDB field, in a thin layer located only meters from the Earth’s surface. Because these materials formed at temperatures in excess of 2200 degrees Celsius, the fact they are present together so near to the surface suggests they were likely created by a MAJOR extraterrestrial impact event...."

E.P. Grondine wrote:Tom -

Would you please go over and bother Steve Garcia and Dennis Cox with your stunning "discoveries"?

As far as impactites goes, they are not fairy dust, and simply disappear.
Those from the 10,850 BCE event were dispersed globally in faint concentrations.

But the “Clovis came over Beringia” idea is based on PREMATURE conclusions, so common in paleontology and archaeology. Out west they had a FEW evidences of Clovis points in widely dispersed locations, and the first ones were found out West, and they had already decided that the first Americans had come over the land bridge, so they simply mooshed the two ideas together,...It was a simple random – and VERY misleading – chance occurrence that that first Clovis point was found near Clovis, NM, instead of in, say, Kentucky. If that point had been found in the East somewhere, the bulk of the 20th century would not have been wasted on that stupid, STUPID premature conclusion.

The origin of the Solutrean stoneworking technique is in some dispute. Most of the evidence indicates it was an invention indigenous to the Dordogne region of France, but some scholars attribute its swift appearance to the arrival of a new people and its equally swift disappearance to destruction of the Solutrean people by another group arriving with a different tool industry. The Solutrean follows the Perigordian and Aurignacian industries and is succeeded by the Magdalenian.

Thaddeus Gutierrez
Fulguritics; geoarchaeological 14C reservoir/depletion modeling; dynamic semi-parametric…

Carolina bays yield many mutually exclusive radiocarbon dates, all of which are many thousands of years older than any 19th c. associationist anecdote can account for, with phases of formation during key glaciation and deglaciation phases of extreme convection differentials. Their origin is aeolian, and their common orientation reflects prevailing wind, with investigators verification biased, ignoring the dune structures that accompany such structures, with aquifer recharge and depletion cycles affecting their entrenchment. Ponding of this form is ubiquitous in many parts of the world and can be positively correlated to high winds, heavy saturation of loessoid sediments, and freezing. All such formations share a long axis with major winds affecting them during their accretion, and shifts in prevailing wind are indexed by their plan contours. Fusion evidence found in and near their sediments is identical to material formed by lightning discharge into wet, fine-grained and humic mediums.

Kalopin wrote:Min- It's the only source to give an explanation to every event that occurred...

...feel free to give any other explanation to argue over...
...Is there even any other option [actual mechanism] that has ever been suggested or discussed?,[ concerning the reason for instant mass extinctions, historical accounts of great catastrophic events and the fact that all plants and all animals, all of a sudden, grew much smaller and lived much shorter lives?, as all this has been documented... But, never a reason...]
Do you have a better one?

[...turns out, the crazies, are the ones teaching and learning the current b.s. :-]

...and how and why does everyone let E.P. and his constituents get away with making outlandish assumptions with no rebuttal?
...is there no one to question how a cometary airburst would produce one geological uplift feature and cause all the events and consequences that have been scientifically proven? [now that's what's crazy!]...

circumspice wrote:

Kalopin wrote:Min- It's the only source to give an explanation to every event that occurred...

...feel free to give any other explanation to argue over...
...Is there even any other option [actual mechanism] that has ever been suggested or discussed?,[ concerning the reason for instant mass extinctions, historical accounts of great catastrophic events and the fact that all plants and all animals, all of a sudden, grew much smaller and lived much shorter lives?, as all this has been documented... But, never a reason...]
Do you have a better one?

[...turns out, the crazies, are the ones teaching and learning the current b.s. :-]

...and how and why does everyone let E.P. and his constituents get away with making outlandish assumptions with no rebuttal?
...is there no one to question how a cometary airburst would produce one geological uplift feature and cause all the events and consequences that have been scientifically proven? [now that's what's crazy!]...

To quote a little known but great American philosopher:

I'm not saying the impactites disappeared, I am saying that the Atlantic ocean did not exist until approx.13kya, was known as Atlas, as it surrounded the entire globe, but for the supercontinent of Pangaea, [...the land mass all on one side...the cause of the imbalance that allowed for the Moon to impact...] which was broken apart, when the Moon impacted where the Mediterranean sea is, and split Atlas to form the Atlantic and Pacific oceans...


...and, though I know we have gone over much of this, have you not noticed?- there are no samples taken from the ocean floors, that are suppose to be from the YDB... [it is my belief there are none, because it was covered by the north and south American plate...]

...please understand- there is no possibility that the ejecta blanket would have crossed over such a great distance, as the entire Atlantic ocean, as an impact that catastrophic would have probably split the planet...
...and an airburst from the breakup of a comet, would not have generated enough heat through the atmosphere to produce nanodiamonds at over 22oo*C. It would have had to be an extreme contact impact...

Last edited by Kalopin on 01 Oct 2016, 18:31, edited 1 time in total.

Kalopin 223 26 Mar 2013, 17:38

Min- It's the only source to give an explanation to every event that occurred...

circumspice wrote:

I'm not saying the impactites disappeared, I am saying that the Atlantic ocean did not exist until approx.13kya, was known as Atlas, as it surrounded the entire globe, but for the supercontinent of Pangaea, [...the land mass all on one side...the cause of the imbalance that allowed for the Moon to impact...] which was broken apart, when the Moon impacted where the Mediterranean sea is, and split Atlas to form the Atlantic and Pacific oceans...


...and, though I know we have gone over much of this, have you not noticed?- there are no samples taken from the ocean floors, that are suppose to be from the YDB... [it is my belief there are none, because it was covered by the north and south American plate...]

...please understand- there is no possibility that the ejecta blanket would have crossed over such a great distance, as the entire Atlantic ocean, as an impact that catastrophic would have probably split the planet...
...and an airburst from the breakup of a comet, would not have generated enough heat through the atmosphere to produce nanodiamonds at over 22oo*C. It would have had to be an extreme contact impact...

Last edited by Kalopin on 01 Oct 2016, 18:31, edited 1 time in total.

Kalopin 223 26 Mar 2013, 17:38

And you "know" this... how?

Tell us Tony... What are your credentials? What is your degree? From which institution/s?

What qualifies you to state that noted, educated authorities on the subject are either crazy or liars?

Note: Surfing the internet, copying fragments of articles & posting them on boards does not qualify you to be an authority on the subject.

You have serious mental health issues that you need to address. After that, get an education.

At this point in time you are nothing more than a mentally unstable Chicken Little catastrophist.

Minimalist wrote:

Min- It's the only source to give an explanation to every event that occurred...

Pink unicorns with magic wands could explain it, too. And be more believable that your moon nonsense.

Kalopin wrote:

circumspice wrote:

I'm not saying the impactites disappeared, I am saying that the Atlantic ocean did not exist until approx.13kya, was known as Atlas, as it surrounded the entire globe, but for the supercontinent of Pangaea, [...the land mass all on one side...the cause of the imbalance that allowed for the Moon to impact...] which was broken apart, when the Moon impacted where the Mediterranean sea is, and split Atlas to form the Atlantic and Pacific oceans...


...and, though I know we have gone over much of this, have you not noticed?- there are no samples taken from the ocean floors, that are suppose to be from the YDB... [it is my belief there are none, because it was covered by the north and south American plate...]

...please understand- there is no possibility that the ejecta blanket would have crossed over such a great distance, as the entire Atlantic ocean, as an impact that catastrophic would have probably split the planet...
...and an airburst from the breakup of a comet, would not have generated enough heat through the atmosphere to produce nanodiamonds at over 22oo*C. It would have had to be an extreme contact impact...

Last edited by Kalopin on 01 Oct 2016, 18:31, edited 1 time in total.

Kalopin 223 26 Mar 2013, 17:38

And you "know" this... how?

Tell us Tony... What are your credentials? What is your degree? From which institution/s?

What qualifies you to state that noted, educated authorities on the subject are either crazy or liars?

Note: Surfing the internet, copying fragments of articles & posting them on boards does not qualify you to be an authority on the subject.

You have serious mental health issues that you need to address. After that, get an education.

At this point in time you are nothing more than a mentally unstable Chicken Little catastrophist.

The simple fact that you, nor anyone can come up with any other option to explain every detail... Do you understand that every aspect, that has been scientifically proven, has to have an explanation?
Do you understand why you are unable to copy and post any form of rebuttal?
...and, if you happen to be able to read, understand, comprehend,... the information being discussed, then you, my friend, will receive an education...
Why don't you go through all my research, determine its accuracy, and come back with something you found that you may be able to argue over. because, , you, yourself, have contributed absolutely squat to this conversation...
[and so, prove my mentals and prove me wrong, 'cause I got about one nerve left and you're on it...;-]

...and, yes, it has already been proven to be a great catastrophe, and so, anyone commenting is, by definition- a catastrophist. If you do not want to discuss catastrophism, [I hate to be the one to tell you,] you're in the wrong place...
Understanding the past correctly, teaching the truth in the present, learning and adjusting for the future,... makes me a futurist [as well...]...

My answer to your demand that I disprove your insane fantasy is for you to read the data put forth by credible, educated experts in all the fields that you have been fouling with your crackpot bullshit wannabe theories.

The Tower is Formed: An Ongoing Debate

Geologists agree that Devils Tower was formed by the intrusion (the forcible entry of magma into or between other rock formations) of igneous material. What they cannot agree upon is how that process took place and whether or not the magma reached the land surface.

Numerous ideas have evolved since the official discovery of Devils Tower. Geologists Carpenter and Russell studied Devils Tower in the late 1800s and came to the conclusion that the Tower was indeed formed by an igneous intrusion. Later geologists searched for more detailed explanations.

In 1907, scientists Darton and O'Hara decided that Devils Tower must be an eroded remnant of a laccolith. A laccolith is a large, mushroom–shaped mass of igneous rock which intrudes between the layers of sedimentary rocks but does not reach the surface. This produces a rounded bulge in the sedimentary layers above the intrusion. This idea was quite popular in the early 1900s when numerous studies were done on a number of laccoliths in the Southwest.
Other ideas have suggested that Devils Tower is a volcanic plug or that it is the neck of an extinct volcano. Although there is no evidence of volcanic activity - volcanic ash, lava flows, or volcanic debris - anywhere in the surrounding countryside, it is possible that this material may simply have eroded away.

The simplest explanation is that Devils Tower is a stock—a small intrusive body formed by magma which cooled underground and was later exposed by erosion.

The magma which formed Devils Tower cooled and crystallized into a rock type known as phonolite porphyry. It is a light to dark-gray or greenish-gray igneous rock with conspicuous crystals of white feldspar. Hot molten magma is less dense and occupies more volume than cool hardened rock. As the rock cooled, it contracted, forming hexagonal (and sometime 4-, 5- and 7-sided) columns separated by vertical cracks. These columns are similar to those found at Devil's Postpile National Monument in California but those at Devils Tower are much larger.

The simplest explanation is that Devils Tower is a stock—a small intrusive body formed by magma which cooled underground and was later exposed by erosion.

you feel compelled to plagiarize the work of educated persons.

get treatment

What are your credentials?

circumspice wrote:
And you "know" this... how?

Tell us Tony... What are your credentials? What is your degree? From which institution/s?

What qualifies you to state that noted, educated authorities on the subject are either crazy or liars?

Note: Surfing the internet, copying fragments of articles & posting them on boards does not qualify you to be an authority on the subject.

You have serious mental health issues that you need to address. After that, get an education.

At this point in time you are nothing more than a mentally unstable Chicken Little catastrophist.

when you attempt to point out to them they're wrong and why they're wrong

complete lack of knowledge of impact blast mechanics.

a fundamental ignorance of the scientific method

You see, I can go on and on,