Page 11 of 14

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:07 pm
by Digit
we can start doing some thinking of our own.
I have!

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:15 pm
by Ishtar
Thanks Beags. I will have a look at that research.

But in the meantime ... as you and I have an opposing belief in something that's yet to be proved, why don't we have a little wager?

Assuming that this is proven one way or the other in our lifetimes, what do you say to £50.00 on it (at present day exchange rates of course :lol: )

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:31 pm
by Digit
A word of warning there Ish. People have been taking pot shots at Darwinism for 150 yrs and it's still going strong!

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:32 pm
by Ishtar
Well, I'm prepared to put my money where my mouth is, Dig! :lol:

And as I said to you before, 150 years is nothing. How long did they believe the sun went round the earth?

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:39 pm
by Beagle
Ishtar wrote:Thanks Beags. I will have a look at that research.

But in the meantime ... as you and I have an opposing belief in something that's yet to be proved, why don't we have a little wager?

Assuming that this is proven one way or the other in our lifetimes, what do you say to £50.00 on it (at present day exchange rates of course :lol: )
Sure - but I need to know exactly what the wager is. :wink:

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:43 pm
by Ishtar
Well, we can work out the exact wording between us.

Here's a first offering:

"That the fossilised bones of the common ancestor of both humans and chimps will be found within five years."

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:47 pm
by Beagle
:lol:

The odds of that happening are extremely small. Is that what constitutes proof to you?

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:50 pm
by Digit
How long did they believe the sun went round the earth?
According to vedic sources several thousand years.

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:56 pm
by Ishtar
Okay...? :?

and which Vedic commentator is that coming from?

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:58 pm
by Ishtar
Beagle wrote::lol:

The odds of that happening are extremely small. Is that what constitutes proof to you?
Well, I find it hard to imagine what else would consititute proof ...but you can make a counter offer more suited to what you believe is likely ....

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:02 pm
by Beagle
I may, but I'm going to take a break and have some supper. I'll be back later but you'll probably need to call it a day.

Archaeology can take more than a lifetime. I wouldn't bet on anything to happen in five years. But, we'll talk about it. :)

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:04 pm
by Ishtar
OK, look forward to talking to you later. :D

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:13 pm
by Digit
http://www.hindusarise.com/achievements.htm

This one Ish. You'll note it claims 'several thousand years'.

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:26 pm
by Minimalist
why don't we have a little wager?


I'll hold the money until one of you wins.

:lol:

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:37 pm
by Ishtar
Oh, I misunderstood you, Dig. I thought you were saying that the Vedics said that the sun went round the earth. I see from this site that what you meant was that they're claiming that they were first with the heliocentric theory. I imagine the Sumerians had it too, though, at the same time.