Bosnian pyramids, photos

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:07 pm

gunny wrote:I love you guys-----finally get to talk to people half as smart as I am!

Only half?

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:13 pm

Well, that proves it Frank. I guess those Scots will say anything.

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:27 pm

Beagle wrote:Well, that proves it Frank. I guess those Scots will say anything.

Yeah but it'll be mighty hard to understand. Aye? Skeered the shyte oota ma ewes lad! Ah'm gevin' 'er all she's gawt cap'n! Ah cannae poosh 'er too farrrr. We're all fooked!

Post by **Minimalist** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:41 pm

Don't pick on Scotty!

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:47 pm

Ciko · Post by **Ciko** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 4:20 am

i think this is the greatest archelogical discovery in history, so biiig, soo old, and in the heart of europe

what can i say

even if you saw in a movie a huge pyramid in the heart of europe you would said, it just to much fantasy, and now it is real

CNN is in visoko today, they will show on direkt cnn 17:00

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 6:05 am

So far it ain't nothin'. You act like you're Oz's publicity agent. All these unsubstantiated claims aren't really helping the cause. Sounds like propaganda to me. They're gonna have to have a lot more than they've got so far to draw the tourism they seem to be seeking.

Ciko · Post by **Ciko** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:41 am

latest photos from excavation

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 8:13 am

Just different pictures of the same stuff. Are they screening the dirt for artifacts? Listen, I hope it is a pyramid, I really do, but so far I see no conclusive evidence that it is. Ciko, don't stop posting, but try to come up with something different. Give us some text with facts and figures. The pics are great and we need more of them, just show us something different, something conclusive. Something dated.

Ciko · Post by **Ciko** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 8:18 am

coming days they are planing to excavate 200 X 50 meters holes , so you can see the pyramid from the city and the air

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
1 1
1 1 50 meters
1 1
1 1
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

200 meters

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 8:22 am

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
1 1
1 1 50 meters
1 1
1 1
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

200 meters

What does this mean?

Sneakerz · Post by **Sneakerz** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:26 am

are they digging at one of the edges of the mountain? I think that would be very interesting, how the edge looks under the soil.
hmm but did you notice this hin the pictures above.. the stones seem to be under the same hight of soil .. or are my eyes cheating me? I dunno but maybe this could be a good clue?

gunny · Post by **gunny** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 10:44 am

KOOL, so for. ANY TOOL MARKS ON THE STONES?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:52 pm

think this is the greatest archelogical discovery in history

if you think that, then you do not read much. sorry but i am inclined to side with frank on this one. the photos may be close ups but they are not far enough away to provide a good look at all that is around the object in the pictures.

some of those pictures look just like small stones mixed with compressed dirt and not the blocks we are accustomed to seeing with pyramids.

ANY TOOL MARKS ON THE STONES

this is a good question. how were the stones quarryed? is there any evidence of the slabs being moved from one place to another? were they shaped by man or natural?

Are they screening the dirt for artifacts

got to agree with frank on this one too. what artifacts are there that substantiates the theory? have tools been found to backup the claim that this is not a natural formation? what evidence other than some slabs of stone tell you that this is a pyramid of the scope of the egyptian or the mayan?

i am not skeptical but like frank the pictures are good, just too positioned (for lack of a better word) to be of much use. lets have some that are not so close up so we can see the surrounding area and the context of the find.

again, fore me it doesn't matter if it is a pyramid or not, i have stated my vested interest in an earlier post so i have no axe to grind here but i would like to see this preented honestly so we can see the evidence for ourselves without being pushed to a pre-drawn conclusion.

200 meters

What does this mean?

again i am with frank onthis. what do this numbers and their sequence have to do with real archaeology (the words 'real archaeology'used without permission, stolen from minimalist)

Post by **Minimalist** » Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:12 pm

Use them freely.

I'm just glad to see you post anything that isn't related to the stupid bible!