Page 11 of 30
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 8:55 am
by marduk
try and work it out this way
1) work out who has killed more people through indirect action (Osama or Dubya)
2) Assess under what right they claimed provenance to rule
3) Drop the idea that either of them represents the actual belief of many of their countrymen
4) Lose the paranoia
5) Live long and prosper
Dubya uses the spectre of Osama to send troops to fight and die
and Osama does the same with Bush
I think its fairly obvious though that if anyone on Earth at this time is actually qualified to be the antichrist its gonna be this woman
shes glamourous
powerful (husband and mother to presidents and senators and governors)
and no one suspects a thing
muhahaha
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:02 am
by Forum Monk
Marduk - you are truly incorrigible and at times absolutely hilarious.
(yeah I mean that in a good way)
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:08 am
by Digit
Changed my mind. Don't want to destroy my air of mystery.
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:18 pm
by Beagle
http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publish ... 9852.shtml
Anthropological studies on the remaining skeleton of a child, found recently wrapped in a white garment in the historic site of Taleb Khan Tepe, revealed the cause of his death to be lack of Vitamin B12.
Announcing this news, Farzad Forouzanfar, director of the Anthropology Department of Iran's Archeology Research Center, said that the child was five years old at the time of death and suffered from severe anemia as a result of Vitamin B12 deficiency.
"The disease is caused by lack of Vitamin B12 which ultimately results in disorder of blood platelet function and decrease of red and white globules," explained Forouzanfar, adding that evidence pointing to the cause of death can still be traced on the child's skull.
It isn't a mystery that people in ancient times died of nutritional deficiencies. Seems interesting that we can pinpoint some of them so well though.
From: Archaeologica News.
B12 Deficiency
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:12 pm
by Cognito
It isn't a mystery that people in ancient times died of nutritional deficiencies. Seems interesting that we can pinpoint some of them so well though.
Beags, I believe that living near the Burnt City after its abandonment takes away some of the mystery of vitamin deficiency since the people at Taleb Khan Tepe were likely living on the margin. If the disease was not due to a congenital problem, they were starving.
At a minimum, they had no meat in their diet.
http://www.andrews.edu/NUFS/vitaminB12.html
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:21 pm
by Beagle
Absolutely. Like I said - no mystery. Pretty neat detective work. They can tell amazing things from bones now.
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 6:18 pm
by Minimalist
People starve to death today....but at least we know the cause!
Ah, progress.
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:11 am
by Beagle
People starve to death today....but at least we know the cause!
Sad but true. As we welcome in a new year in '07 there are still countries in abject poverty, despite any foriegn aid - or in some cases, the lack of it.
There are many examples, but North Korea may be the worse.
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:12 am
by Minimalist
Darfur.
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:15 am
by Beagle
Good case in point!
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:44 am
by Minimalist
An impossible situation.
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:58 am
by Beagle
Yeah, unfortunately. Against the backdrop of the poverty and the violence of the world, the US and other more wealthy nations like the UK are pretty powerless.
There is poverty, war, and even slavery in Africa. There are not resources to correct all these ills. Whenever and wherever we use our military - we will be criticized.
I could be an islolationist if I would just lose a few IQ points. It sounds so good at times.
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:28 am
by Digit
Sad but true both you guys. But in many cases the solution has to come from within. Aid isn't always the answer. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:30 am
by Minimalist
IF the Sudanese government won't cooperate there is no reaching that spot without conquering Sudan, first. Thanks to Bush we have virtually no capability to even threaten to intervene.
Sudan
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:37 am
by Cognito
IF the Sudanese government won't cooperate there is no reaching that spot without conquering Sudan, first. Thanks to Bush we have virtually no capability to even threaten to intervene.
So much for the
RDF concept with troops being committed to Afghanistan and Iraq in a defensive grave with no exit plan.
