Noah's Flood...

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:38 am

By the way, who's Vido Mortenson (must be a handsome devil)?

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:38 am

and whats this with the anti christ being a man anyway
if the Messiah is a man then surely the anti christ would be a woman
i think its Barbara Bush
i have my reasons

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:41 am

I think one of the funniest cracks I ever heard was some guy saying "she looks like that guy on the Quaker Oats box," I about fell out.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:23 pm

the topic is noah's flood, let's get back to it and stop hijacking threads

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:00 pm

Ok archae, so where is the evidence for the global-encompassing Noah's Flood which you espouse?

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:04 pm

GV - Arch agreed to let this thread die several weeks ago. It was properly sinking to the bottom but Arch recently revived it - to cause trouble, as is his nature.

You will not get what you seek from him. This was started by a person exploring the Ryan/Pitman theory. I hope it can die.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:07 pm

But the story of Noah's Flood clearly describes a global-encompassing flood, so I guess he/she should have entitled the thread differently.

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:10 pm

I accept that point. Daybrown is an intelligent woman but I don't think she envisioned the trouble that this would eventually cause in the hands of a
creationist/troll.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:14 pm

Rather presumptuous of her to automatically treat the Biblical account of Noah's Flood as pure baloney, wouldn't you say?

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:21 pm

I guess you should start reading from the beginning. You couldn't be more wrong. It was, at one time, a scientific discussion.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:25 pm

It would be more scientific if you'd stop bashing the primary road-map for archaeological endeavours in the Middle East.

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:32 pm

Nope - you're spiraling down into nonsense now GV. I'm lettin' you go.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:35 pm

It's interesting that Ryan and Pitman cite circa 6000 B.C. for when the Med surged into the Black Sea basin, because mainstream dogma is that the sea level rose thousands of years before that with the end of the Ice Age, so how does one reconcile this conflict of theses?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:37 pm

Please explain to me how citing that the Bible has been the primary road-map for archaeological endevours in the Middle East is "spiraling down into nonsense?" I think the nonsense is coming from your end.

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:50 pm

[img][img]http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h298/LL3850/th_padlock.jpg[/img]
[/img]