Page 110 of 111
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:38 am
by Guest
By the way, who's Vido Mortenson (must be a handsome devil)?
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:38 am
by marduk
and whats this with the anti christ being a man anyway
if the Messiah is a man then surely the anti christ would be a woman
i think its Barbara Bush
i have my reasons

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 7:41 am
by Guest
I think one of the funniest cracks I ever heard was some guy saying "she looks like that guy on the Quaker Oats box," I about fell out.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:23 pm
by Guest
the topic is noah's flood, let's get back to it and stop hijacking threads
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:00 pm
by Guest
Ok archae, so where is the evidence for the global-encompassing Noah's Flood which you espouse?
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:04 pm
by Beagle
GV - Arch agreed to let this thread die several weeks ago. It was properly sinking to the bottom but Arch recently revived it - to cause trouble, as is his nature.
You will not get what you seek from him. This was started by a person exploring the Ryan/Pitman theory. I hope it can die.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:07 pm
by Guest
But the story of Noah's Flood clearly describes a global-encompassing flood, so I guess he/she should have entitled the thread differently.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:10 pm
by Beagle
I accept that point. Daybrown is an intelligent woman but I don't think she envisioned the trouble that this would eventually cause in the hands of a
creationist/troll.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:14 pm
by Guest
Rather presumptuous of her to automatically treat the Biblical account of Noah's Flood as pure baloney, wouldn't you say?
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:21 pm
by Beagle
I guess you should start reading from the beginning. You couldn't be more wrong. It was, at one time, a scientific discussion.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:25 pm
by Guest
It would be more scientific if you'd stop bashing the primary road-map for archaeological endeavours in the Middle East.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:32 pm
by Beagle
Nope - you're spiraling down into nonsense now GV. I'm lettin' you go.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:35 pm
by Guest
It's interesting that Ryan and Pitman cite circa 6000 B.C. for when the Med surged into the Black Sea basin, because mainstream dogma is that the sea level rose thousands of years before that with the end of the Ice Age, so how does one reconcile this conflict of theses?
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:37 pm
by Guest
Please explain to me how citing that the Bible has been the primary road-map for archaeological endevours in the Middle East is "spiraling down into nonsense?" I think the nonsense is coming from your end.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:50 pm
by Beagle