dr. schoch and his contribution to archaeology

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:50 pm

What was this thread about again? Why don't you guys stop all the breast beating and discuss something? And don't you dare point out my typos!

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:51 pm

What was this thread about again? Why don't you guys stop all the breast beating and discuss something? And don't you dare point out my typos!

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:53 pm

you are claiming that the Nazca lines have a Sumerian inscription

i see you can't read english very well either Beagle

The lines at nazca and the inscription on the pokotia monolith are quite similar in a Sumerian way aren’t they?

it was the pokotia monolith thaty has the proto sumerian inscription
thats well known by orthodoxy but it doesnt prove anything because theres no way to prove how it got there or what time it arrived. it could have been as late as 1970 that it ended up where it was found

thanks for that frank
it was worth saying
i see you said it twice for emphasis

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:56 pm

Yeah, hi Frank. I posted a web page about Schoch and the Red Pyramid. I don't know much about the Red Pyramid but Schoch seems to think that it was built on an older existing structure. Check it out.

"Course then Marduk did his usual thing.

Read his website that I posted. That's what has him all bent.

Cognito · Post by **Cognito** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:56 pm

Hi Beagle, I have known Marduk for some time and can assure you that he does not promote orthodoxy. As a matter of fact, I have seen him come up with a few unorthodox ideas that he was willing to discard after using the Socratic method on him, demonstrating an open mind. The only time I have had a problem with Marduk is when I have proposed some sort of poorly thought out, half-wit speculation and attempted to defend it with more speculation.

Being schooled initially in science and then making my way through the halls of academia in economics and accounting, I hold logic in high esteem. Unfortunately, I fail to apply it from time to time and appreciate Marduk's ability to bring me down from space patrol.

Marduk is an important resource if you can stick to the issues and keep from speculating. Otherwise, I would suggest a duel at noon with the sword of your choice ... however, my recommendation would be to fall on your sword first before the conflict, which you may have already done.

"Nothing here, folks, move along ..."

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:59 pm

OK Marduk, explain it any way you want. It's there for everyone to read.

I may repost it later.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:05 pm

OK Marduk, explain it any way you want. It's there for everyone to read.

I don't need to explain it Beagle
i wrote it and posted it on the internet
that would suggest that i know what it says don't you think
if you'd like further information on it pm me or start a thread on the pokotia monolith or nazca

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:08 pm

Thanks for your thoughts Cognito. I've never had the chance to have a real conversation with you. I'm sure you're sincere in what you are saying but I don't think you mentioned his lack of social skills.

Some people would like him to be more polite.

And sorry, he's still a fake.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:13 pm

lol
hypocrite

you attacked me Beagle without provocation and then you accused me of a lack of social skills
a simple apology would have sufficed
but thats way beyond you isn't it

and when did i ever claim to be orthodox
it was you who claimed that after my first post remember
because i post at maat
maybe at some point youd actually check to see what i post at maat
idiot

i can provide you with some links if you like

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:15 pm

Why don't you guys stop all the breast beating

isn't that 'chest-thumping', frank?

it is possible that the red pyramid was built over another structure, as to sacred, maybe maybe not, but it also could have been that they re-used old stones also.

Cognito · Post by **Cognito** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:21 pm

Beagle wrote:

Some people would like him to be more polite.

And sorry, he's still a fake.

I entered this thread late so I'm not certain who is and isn't being polite, however, as far as being a fake ... I'm not sure what you mean. Fake what?

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:22 pm

That kind of oratory is too much for me. I guess I should look for somebody I can "handle".

Now, when someone - anyone - makes a post here, try to either not respond or contribute something to what was posted.

After a while you are going to get tired of looking like a fool if you don't.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:30 pm

is this to your fan club of loyal supporters or just to me

Now, when someone - anyone - makes a post here, try to either not respond or contribute something to what was posted.

if you check back you will find that i was contributing my opinion to what was posted about Schochs psuedo theory
you were the one not contributing anything
are you getting tired now or confused

That kind of oratory is too much for me. I guess I should look for somebody I can "handle".

here you go
http://www.flchild.com/

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:39 pm

You're going in circles. Here is the point.

You constantly over use the the prefix pseudo.

I posted the url to your website, which has very unorthodox and speculative views.

You've been called on it and you have become very upset. You can't change the facts.

Final point. When you make fun of a member and use pseudoderisive language, I'll repost your website url right behind you - if I'm here of course.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:47 pm

here are the facts
1.the only person who ever claimed i was 100 % orthodox was you after my first post. that is a personal belief on your part not based on any evidence.
2.the website that you think is my dirty little psuedo secret is accesible from my profile at this forum. it is even linked to underneath each of my posts in a www. link
3. the content of the website is not in any way speculative as its backed up by orthodox evidence
4. you apparently are an idiot (this is also based on evidence)

don't you get tired of being wrong Beagle
or just can't you admit it when you are
if i was wrong at any time i would say so immediately, i don't have beliefs i have opinions which can be swayed by evidence
people respect you for that
they don't respect you for being an arrogant stubborn asshole
kapeesh ?

You've been called on it and you have become very upset

is a person very upset when they post lots of smileys in their posts
i've been laughing at your inability to get to a valid point all night
as have others
theres only one person going round in circles chasing his own tail here buddy
and its a Beagle

Final point. When you make fun of a member and use pseudoderisive language, I'll repost your website url right behind you - if I'm here of course

is this at the same time that youre still claiming i'm an orthodox club
member. and once again finally you don't need to post the link
you could just say
"check out the link on marduks profile, hes got a secret website which is why it has his name all over it and why its linked to at almost every forum hes a member at"
ok with you ?
roflmao

Archaeologica.org

dr. schoch and his contribution to archaeology

Archaeological Domestic Violence

Question