archaeologists--the players

oldarchystudent · Post by **oldarchystudent** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:35 pm

Beagle wrote:Oas - you do what you want, but I wouldn't waste an ounce of cyber-breathe on Arch.

Notice that when we get a little peace, and start posting a lot of archaeology - he starts trying to cause trouble. That is what he does. He knows absolutely nothing about archaeology and wants to talk religion. Just like our other fellow in here now.

He'll keep posting behind you, but Arch will get mean about it. He is terribly threatened by actual archaeology.

I noticed that. These two make quite a pair......

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:43 pm

When have I talked about religion, oas? I've been talking about the evidences about ancient history, more than I can say for you.

Post by **Minimalist** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:14 pm

oldarchystudent wrote:
Beagle wrote:Oas - you do what you want, but I wouldn't waste an ounce of cyber-breathe on Arch.

Notice that when we get a little peace, and start posting a lot of archaeology - he starts trying to cause trouble. That is what he does. He knows absolutely nothing about archaeology and wants to talk religion. Just like our other fellow in here now.

He'll keep posting behind you, but Arch will get mean about it. He is terribly threatened by actual archaeology.
I noticed that. These two make quite a pair......

And yet Jean Marie was the one who got banned? Odd.

oldarchystudent · Post by **oldarchystudent** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:35 pm

Minimalist wrote:
oldarchystudent wrote:
Beagle wrote:Oas - you do what you want, but I wouldn't waste an ounce of cyber-breathe on Arch.

Notice that when we get a little peace, and start posting a lot of archaeology - he starts trying to cause trouble. That is what he does. He knows absolutely nothing about archaeology and wants to talk religion. Just like our other fellow in here now.

He'll keep posting behind you, but Arch will get mean about it. He is terribly threatened by actual archaeology.
I noticed that. These two make quite a pair......

And yet Jean Marie was the one who got banned? Odd.

Who is Jean Marie? I'm kinda new here....

Post by **Minimalist** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:52 pm

Kind of hard to explain Jean Marie....

Think of Arch only less polite and even more strident.

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:55 pm

Who is Jean Marie? I'm kinda new here....

She was a fundie/troll and was before my time also. From time to time things can get nearly impossible around here. A few of us have another place to go and continue on at those times. Also when the board goes down, we can communicate. If it starts up again, I'll send you a link - or even sooner.

Min, Frank, Leona are among those who can tell you much more about JM.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:58 pm

Was Jean Marie a Fundamentalist Darwinite troll, like min?

Post by **Minimalist** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:59 pm

Jean Marie's work seems to have been purged from the archives. Most of what remains is from 2006 and she did not make it to the new year as I recall.

oldarchystudent · Post by **oldarchystudent** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:04 pm

Beagle wrote:
Who is Jean Marie? I'm kinda new here....
She was a fundie/troll and was before my time also. From time to time things can get nearly impossible around here. A few of us have another place to go and continue on at those times. Also when the board goes down, we can communicate. If it starts up again, I'll send you a link - or even sooner.

Min, Frank, Leona are among those who can tell you much more about JM.

So was she worse than what's on this board now????

Post by **Minimalist** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:05 pm

I wouldn't say worse.....

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:08 pm

As bad as the fundie troll min?

oldarchystudent · Post by **oldarchystudent** » Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:09 pm

Hmmmm... I would be interested in that alternate, Beagle.

Anyway - the players - I mentioned John Romer.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:31 am

frank keeps chastising me and it is quite clear, i am not the one who is mudslinging nor insulting. by the way beagle your post is just one big lie and i am glad i will be leaving this board.

i announced it so people would not think that they actually drove me away. i am actually tired of what passes for archaeological discussion here and i am tired of the endless insults which frank lets go until i let something slip.

i have actually accomplished much here but the secular posters will never admit to it because it means admitting that they were and are wrong.

here is a news flash for you, you can't have archaeology without the Bible, it doesn't work. so when you get tired of trying to omit it, give me a call.