Page 16 of 77

Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:52 am
by Ciko
Image

reply

Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:00 am
by Guest
That's the same-hypothetical- pictures we've already seen about four times.
Could someone PM me when the thread shows some sign of actually having a point?

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 12:33 am
by Guest
i went back and checked ciko's posts. sometimes his english is good, other times it is like his present post. which tells me that he knows english really well and playing everyone for fools or he is just a lousy typist.

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:18 am
by Ciko
i went back and checked ciko's posts. sometimes his english is good, other times it is like his present post. which tells me that he knows english really well and playing everyone for fools or he is just a lousy typist.

no man, nooo :?

my english is really bad, a catastrophe :(

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:40 am
by Ciko
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:42 pm
by Beagle
I'm a little dissappointed. This is the first set of pics that look entirely natural to me. Not that I would know but the rock seems to be of natural concretion that has cracked linearly by something like an upthrusting of the underlying ground.

fraud

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:01 pm
by stan
http://www.archaeology.org/online/featu ... index.html

Archaeology Magazine has come out swinging against
Osmanagic!

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:04 pm
by Minimalist
That does not surprise me. Orthodoxy always closes ranks.

Osmanagic's colors revealed...Pretty damning stuff

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:09 am
by FreeThinker
Well, I really was hoping this pyramid story would turn out to be true...wasn't betting on it but still I hoped it might just be a great new discovery. OK, I admit I wasn't reading the text of this topic (16 pages...ewww) and was just looking at the pictures, but I just got done reading the Archaeology magazine post and it pretty well sealed it for me, at least as far as anything Osmanagic has to say.

Here are some choice quotes they dug up from one of his books on Mayan pyramids:
"It is my theory that the Maya should be considered watchmakers of the cosmos whose mission it is to adjust the Earthly frequency and bring it into accordance with the vibrations of our Sun."
"These facts become exceptionally important when we realize that we are rapidly approaching December 2012, a date which the Maya have marked as the time of arrival of the Galactic Energy Cluster which will enlighten us."
"The Mayan hieroglyphics tell us that their ancestors came from the Pleiades... first arriving at Atlantis where they created an advanced civilization."
This Maya stuff is pure bunk of the highest order. If Osmanagic is the leader of this Bosnian pyramid venture I am inclined to think it too is bunk. I also was unaware that the pyramid was claimed to be the fantasticly old age of 12,000 years; a time before agriculture, domestication of animals, writing, or even pottery (in that region). Furthermore, the pics of the digs have not revealed anything so far that I can see. Sadly, barring something like the discovery of a sarcophagus carbon dating to 12,000 years old, I now am firmly on the side of the unbelievers.

pyramid

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:55 am
by stan
Looks that way to me, too, so far. I have a hunch something
interesting will be found there, but what? Osmanagic has
fouled his own nest, I think....however, there are people who
will believe anything they are told about extra-terrestrials,
cosmic vibrations, Atlantis, etc. Osmaanagic is the Geraldo Rivera of
archeology.

Some of rocks appeared to be abutted with straight- line joints.
BUt when you pull back and look at the larger picture, the joints
"craze" and run off inconsistently in different directions, as if the rocks were
cracked apart along fault lines rather than being joined there.
THe geology is kind of interesting. There is some conglomerate
rock that seems to be made of seashells, then yellowish sandstone, and
some other material.

The article in ARchaeology points out that the world's media guoted
everything Os said as if he were really an authority. THere's a lot of
ignorance out there!

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:35 am
by Ciko
reading the Archaeology magazine post
i think this is a bullshit, you know why


beacuse they have not visited this place , they haven't see anything

like those bosnian archelogist, they havent visited this place that is why i can not believe them, when osmangich asked one of them what this stone blocks were , he had no answer :? so how can i believe such people


one of the those who signed the petition against escavation changed his meind after a visit today , he shall join the excavation i think, because he said that this building is not from romanian empire, or medival bosnia

big victory today :w00t: :w00t:



stairs to the acces platoue, i think

Image

Image

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:55 am
by Beagle
Yeah, Oz is a bit of a weirdo. But it reminds me of Heinrich Schliemann when he discovered Troy (one of them anyway). He made a real mess of things but in the end he made a great discovery. One can only hope.

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:03 pm
by Minimalist
Good pix, Ciko. Even if those 'stairs' were not constructed but rather chiselled out of existing rock, they certainly do not look like natural features.

Natural vs. Man Made Formations

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:50 pm
by FreeThinker
Irrespective of Osmanagic's looney cosmic Atlantian rants the pictures posted in this thread look like natural formations to me. A quick google of "rock layers" and "layered rock" came up with these pics:

Image

Image

Image

The first one is a picture of rock layers in Death Valley that look like the "stairs" cited above. The other two, with their straight lines and squared off corners come from pictures taken by the Mars rovers and are in fact pictures of rocks on Mars. No chance they are man made. They look just like all the pics of the "stone blocks" posted throughout this thread. I am far from convinced.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs. So far I have not seen it. Coupled with the "Chariots of the Gods" mindset of Osmanagic my skepticism is well founded.

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:37 pm
by f9
http://vetinari.sitesled.com/slavic.pdf
Probably this have some base in the theory...of Bosniana Jones
And please stop with that liar Schleman.He havent found nothing.Turkish border patrol have filled evidence when they have catch him with the"Priam gold" trying to get in Turkey to plant this gold in the "Troya scam"
Or maybe it is plausable Agamemnon mask with Vilhem I Prusian Emperor face lift and with aditional engavings of Turkish mustachi from 18 century?
Archeology is based on fakes.It is fact.
It is Piramyd 100 %? I am not at all blind...you?
It is made from nature or people?Probably from both!
Is it Bosnian Ramses there-no,havent nothing to do with Egipt
Is it in danger something from exavations?Probably yes-someone authority in the field-of archeology.On the top of the hill there are Medievel fortres builded on Roman post builded on Illirian willage.
Hill is most probably redesigned to guard the base with couple of layers of
stone walls.Looking on the state of the top of the hill I am pleased that
some enterprenour have come up with something like this beside probably state archeologists who have done nothing to none for the three
layers on the top and how they have explained... 'with nathional primary importance"/
For expert on the "geological stratigrafy"..stop theorising somethin what is not your area .All exavation result have been publicised and they explicit proof that this structures are in mess from geological and petrografical point...point that humans have played with the material on the hill.Did they want to build piramid or it is somethin else...we will see.