Zahi will be happy.

Random older topics of discussion

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Forum Monk
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: USA

Post by Forum Monk »

From my point of view, either the artisan which created the image was not very good at his craft, or this woman is not egyptian. I base this on browsing images of other egyptian statuary (very few this old) and she does not appear to have typical egyptian features. The nose and bone structure of the face are not typical, lips are not typical, a little more well-fed than I usually see. She looks foreign...very modern looking as one observer has already pointed out.
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Re: Tombs

Post by Beagle »

Cognito wrote:
what about the tombs below the temples
didn't move them did they
quite happy to see that piece of Egypts heritage submerged
never wonder why


Maybe the tombs didn't fit the revisionist agenda? Here's an Egyptian noblewoman from circa 2650bce. Notice anything unusual about her?

Image
Ok Cog, my final answer: The hair style is wrong for Egyptian women of that period. It should be much more close cropped and shorter.
User avatar
Cognito
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Southern California

Fourth Dynasty

Post by Cognito »

Beags, the woman is actually Fourth Dynasty approx. 2600bce and demonstrates Armenian features with blue eyes. Not what you would normally expect for Egypt at the time, eh? 8)
Natural selection favors the paranoid
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16033
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Minimalist »

Perhaps a simple case of artistic license.

Has any woman ever complained about a portrait that was flattering?
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Re: Fourth Dynasty

Post by Beagle »

Cognito wrote:Beags, the woman is actually Fourth Dynasty approx. 2600bce and demonstrates Armenian features with blue eyes. Not what you would normally expect for Egypt at the time, eh? 8)
And I was looking at women during Djosers' time. :roll: Forum Monk mentioned that she lacked Egyptian features.

Tomorrow let us know who she is. She might have come from an area farther east, where blue eyes are not uncommon.
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Beagle »

http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0104/p07s01-alar.html
CAIRO – Zahi Hawass is one part celebrity, one part investigator. Egypt's lead sleuth in the country's hunt to reclaim ancient antiquities has gained a reputation for often strong-arming curators and bullying museum directors. But while he's attracted critics in his hunt for Egypt's mummies and pharaonic masks, his hard-nosed techniques are indeed paying off.
Mr. Hawass, chief of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, has recovered some 3,500 objects, including the Ramses I mummy from Atlanta's Michael C. Carlos Museum and an ancient sarcophagus from the chairperson of Chicago's electric utility, Exelon.
Go get 'em ZH!
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Post by Digit »

Hopefully things have improved, but some years ago the BBC ran a programme about the Cairo museum and the conditions there, they weren't good! The took us into see conservators at work and showed how one conservator did more damage in 45 minutes than several thousand years of history.
With possesion comes responsibility.
Locked