Page 3 of 77
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:00 am
by Ciko
I'm not convinced; the 'stone blocks' don't look particularly man-made,
you are kidding

man look, how prefect they are shaped and polished
pyramid walls
pyramid tunels

reply
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:40 am
by RK Awl-O'Gist
Those stones don't look anything other than natural.
As for the 'pyramid tunnels'-why are they apparently through hard-packed earth, when you want us to believe there's a 'man-made pyramid' under all that soil?
Isn't this hoax of yours played out ?
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:25 pm
by Guest
Those stones don't look anything other than natural.
/ who shall i believe , geologist who worked in that area for 25 years or you, the geologist who worked whit this said that this is man made stone blocks,
As for the 'pyramid tunnels'-why are they apparently through hard-packed earth, when you want us to believe there's a 'man-made pyramid' under all that soil?
Isn't this hoax of yours played out ?
this is not hoax

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:45 pm
by Minimalist
It's been there for at least 8,000 years. Why not wait until the research teams see what is there before jumping to conclusions one way or the other?
Or....is there no fun in that?
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:23 pm
by Guest
It's been there for at least 8,000 years
.
/ nobody said that this pyramid or whaterever it is , is 8000 years old
Why not wait until the research teams see what is there before jumping to conclusions one way or the other?
it is best so

, but i think that this is a pyramid after all evidence i saw
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:40 pm
by gunny
What you are seeing in the background of your photo is a modern building?
reply
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:07 pm
by RK Awl-O'Gist
Anonymous wrote:/ who shall i believe , geologist who worked in that area for 25 years or you, the geologist who worked whit this said that this is man made stone blocks,
We only have
your word that the guy has been a geologist in that area for 25 years!
Minimalist wrote:It's been there for at least 8,000 years
Says who? Or is this "intrepid archaeologist" the son of Erich Von Daniken, perhaps?!
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:33 pm
by Rokcet Scientist
There's a helluvalot of David-Copperfield-ish smoke and mirrors going on here, guys. It's either a scam artist or a dimwit. But what would the angle on that scam be?
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:01 pm
by Minimalist
I've seen estimates up to 10,000 years old but I still think that the expedition should be allowed to complete its survey.
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:35 am
by Guest
i know almost everything about this pyramid since a have red everything about it, news raport and so on
What you are seeing in the background of your photo is a modern building?
that is right, but this stoneblocks were transported to that area
We only have your word that the guy has been a geologist in that area for 25 years!
it is a woman, Nadija Nukich

, she worked as ageologists in bosnian area for 25 years
Says who? Or is this "intrepid archaeologist" the son of Erich Von Daniken, perhaps?!
it is media who said that, mr osmanagich said that they shall in investigate the age of thid pyramid
some media said it is 10 000, some 7000 some 15 000

, but osmanagich never said that this pyramid is so old
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:04 am
by Frank Harrist
Cool accent.

reply
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:22 am
by RK Awl-O'Gist
I'm suspicious that every photo and quote you post come directly from the bosnianpyramid.com website; which makes me suspect that you're an Osmanagich mouthpiece masquerading as a concerned member of the public.....

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:33 am
by Minimalist
This is why a second, independent, study of the site is needed.
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:23 am
by Guest
hahaha

that was funny
i am not osmanagich but i have talked to osmanagich via e-mail

reply
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:34 am
by RK Awl-O'Gist
No-one suggested you were Osmanagich...you just seem overkeen to fight his battles for him....