Got a bill from the hospital for $29K. Four nights!
4 nights at the Waldorf would have been a tenth of that and you'd have had a better time.
Anyway, wasn't there a group in Spain dated to about 25,000 BC?
Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters
Got a bill from the hospital for $29K. Four nights!
Again, look at your map. How does a reclusive and now "underground" creature manage to stomp all over north america? No bones, no scat, no signs of dwellings or feed/forage locations; no evidence they exist whatsoever. BUT - something has convinced you Frank. What is it? I don't believe you been talking to Jack Daniels or Bud Weiser.Frank Harrist wrote:What if they didn't die out, but went "underground"?
Videos and photos are problematic as you know. People have been playing games with film since cameras were invented. Some even think the Shroud of Turin is a kind of photographic scam based on a camera obscura. Hair, bones, teeth, DNA - these are compelling since they are physical evidence.Frank Harrist wrote:I'm not really convinced.You say there's no evidence, but there is evidence. People just don't accept it. Correct, there is no definitive proof, but many small things which point to the conclusion that there is something out there. There are a couple of good videos, the Patterson/Gimlin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ByWc5hTgBk film and the Freeman footage http://www.metacafe.com/watch/799471/fr ... t_footage/ which are compelling.
UFOs are the same. Many, many eyewitnesses and not a single shred of physical evidence.A few others are iffy. There have been countless tracks found in places where no one could possibly expect someone to be. Why hoax track deep in the woods where no one goes just on the off chance someone mught see them? And then there are the thousands of eyewitness accounts, some of which are pure fiction, some are mis-identification, but so many?
Huh? Where is the reference for this? Who found it? What is it? Who analyzed it?There has been DNA evidence found but nothing to compare it to so no way to classify it without a body.
New species are often found. One can never say for certain, I suppose.No not convinced, but certainly curious.
Get a real taste of Scotland on this two day trip from Edinburgh. Venture into Inverness, the capital city of the Highlands which sits astride the Loch Ness, home to the elusive Loch Ness Monster.
but then....the tests came back....Steve: Tell me about how you wound up doing a DNA sequence analysis of what was allegedly a Sasquatch.
Coltman: Well! It was last summer—July—and I was watching the news and there was a Sasquatch sighting in the Yukon that had really sort of taken the imagination of the media. It was on the CBC, it was on television; and these people who had seen the Sasquatch over their backyard had actually found hair and footprints the next morning and they sent the hair to the regional biologist in the Yukon. I happened to know, I have done some work with biologists in Yukon before and I think one of the media asked them if they would be able to do a DNA test, but they didn't have the resources to do that. So, that evening I—on a whim almost—sent an e-mail and said just send that hair down to our lab here and we will test it for you because we do a lot of DNA work from hair and other kinds of samples. So, it was quite a straightforward thing for us to test and I though[t] well, kind of on a whim; and also maybe to help them out so that he could be absolutely certain that what it was and to satisfy curiosity of the public by we running this test on.
So, we tested it against that database to find out what it would match and this was something [where] you quite literally cut and paste the sequence into your browser on the Web and it will return with the best matches; and it came back with 100 percent matches to a bison. So, we were pretty sure we had a bison.
lolMinimalist wrote:...it came back with 100 percent matches to a bison. So, we were pretty sure we had a bison.