Archaeologica.org

Anything which disproves your bible bias will never be acceptable to you.

Face it. Your attitude is squarly non-scientific.

Your attitude is squarly non-scientific.

as i have proven by the quotes, the 'idea' of what is scientific is, is not uniform but relies on the whims of those who think they are scientists. given the facts gleaned from those quotes, i have proventhat intelligent design/creation is and canbe scientific thus those who cry differently do so only out of bias and a refusal to acknowledge that there is something greater than science can explain.

Anything which disproves your bible bias will never be acceptable to you.

you can't disprove the truth. Finkelstein and dever use a system of dating that is arbitrary and flexible which means no matter when the bible says it happens, they can manipulate the dating to say otherwise. i have no trust in those type of conclusions which stake their claims upon a system that is neither accurate nor foolproof.

no matter if they use radio carbon dating, potasium dating or what ever one, there is always the element of corruption in the tested material and you can never be 100% sure if the material tested was free from corruption.

Yes, I know....everyone is out to discredit your bible which is the sole fountain of truth and reason. You have a persecution complex.

Face it, these are reputable scientists who process their work through peer review. They not not bible-toting flim-flam artists who need people like you to keep supporting them while they do their 'holy' work.

You're being gleefully taken for a ride by con men.

Face it, these are reputable scientists who process their work through peer review

peer review is not infallible, when are you going to stop putting your faith in those that are the same as you?

Religious nuts burn people at the stake who attempt peer review.

I prefer the scientific method.