Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
No Cog, he's ignoring it!but you seem to be stubbornly missing the point.
Your friends, the geologists, and every earthquake or volcanic disaster.Digit wrote:Who says the plates are colliding?
Do you have a problem reading compass directions and maps, Roy? The Oz plate, moving NE (on its trek to the north of the Pacific Ocean), bumps into the SE Asian plate at an almost perpendicular angle.As I understand the situation Oz is moving NE and scraping along the Asian plate
Since when is California moving North EAST?just as California is doing
I have news for you: in 1906 an earthquake destroyed San Francisco by creating lateral fissureswhich does not form a subduction zone or deep trenches.
Correct: they have mountains, the highlands.There is no deep trench where England has collided with Scotland
Correct: they have mountains, the Alps.or where Africa has hit Europe
Correct: they have mountains, the Himalayas.and none where India has hit Asia.
Except for the Wallace, Weber, Lydekker, Mariana and dozens and dozens of other trenches of course. Just because you don't see them doesn't mean they ain't there...Mountains, yes, quakes, yes, volcanoes, yes, trenches, nil!
Then you're a docile fundie. I'm not a priest, minister, or pope either, and I DO claim to be superior in knowledge to them.No I am not a geo, therefore I listen to those who are and do not claim to be superior in knowledge to them.
If a trek of 100,000 kilometers walking involves 200 river/water/strait crossings, 99% of which are less than a couple hundred metres, then that is a walking trip. Not a boating trip.floating, rafting etc is not walking
If Galileo Galileï could then I can too.you can't keep on facing both ways nor ignoring the evidence nor the opinions of geologists.
Yeah, exactly like Surtsey did. Local aberration.as you can read here the sea floor north of Oz is rising, if you accept what geos state of course.
But we have superior knowledge to geos and ignore them don't we? Or is that only went it suits us RS?Your friends, the geologists, and every earthquake or volcanic disaster.
Not that I've noticed, I certainly haven't got lost recently.Do you have a problem reading compass directions and maps, Roy?
Correct! Which in English vernacular makes it scraping along the edge, OK?The Oz plate, moving NE (on its trek to the north of the Pacific Ocean), bumps into the SE Asian plate at an almost perpendicular angle.
That would be a little difficult, you seem to be he who ignores things.And you conveniently ignore the Indian Ocean plate moving east...
It isn't, it's moving north relative to the eastern land mass, a typo on my part, like EP I reserve the right to make mistakes, the difference between us is I know it.Since when is California moving North EAST?
Again your generally good English has let you down, in geo terms a lateral fissure is not a trench. Check out Challenger Deep etc.I have news for you: in 1906 an earthquake destroyed San Francisco by creating lateral fissures
See above.Except for the Wallace, Weber, Lydekker, Mariana and dozens and dozens of other trenches of course. Just because you don't see them doesn't mean they ain't there...
Then I'm a docile fundie, not a fool.Then you're a docile fundie. I'm not a priest, minister, or pope either, and I DO claim to be superior in knowledge to them.
I don't care if it's a million Kms, rafting etc in English is not walking!If a trek of 100,000 kilometers walking involves 200 river/water/strait crossings, 99% of which are less than a couple hundred metres, then that is a walking trip. Not a boating trip.
The difference betwixt you and he is that he was correct, it was so established by docile fundies.If Galileo Galileï could then I can too.
Code: Select all
Yeah, exactly like Surtsey did. Local aberration.No lo contendere.Digit wrote:But we are all wasting our time of course
You would know: you're eating the geologists version of events like gospel... Even to the extent that you liberally misinterpret their data in ignorant bliss...Digit wrote:I watched TV programme some years ago, about the Messiah.
In the audience were reps of all the major religions and their various sects, every one on of them knew when the Messiah would return/appear.
Every one of them knew where He would appear.
Every one of them knew that they alone were privy to this information.
Slight snag, they all disagreed with eacah as to where/when this would happen!
Every one of the knew that they were destined for Paradise/Heaven.
Every one of them knew that all the others were condemned to Hellfire.
Every one of them needed no proof as they all knew that they were right.
Sounds familiar doesn't it?
No, Roy, "plane stupid" is just plain stupid.Digit wrote:Independent thought that is plane stupid is just plane stupid.
I never said it did, Roy.Digit wrote:And a stupid idea remains a stupid idea, the fact that it originated as an Independent thought doesn't alter that!
Malaysia was HE. I'll PM you some maps of the Cordilleran and Laurentide ice sheets and data on their opening in addition to some nice maps of Beringea and East Asia during the LGM that I'm waiting on.The HE in Asia map needs to be updated for the find of HE at 1.8 mya in Malaysia. Or was that HH?
:p)
Also, could someone find some images/info on when the passage between the Cordilla and Northern ice sheets was open?
Interesting. I wouldn't mind if you posted 'm here.Cognito wrote:I'll PM you some maps of the Cordilleran and Laurentide ice sheets and data on their opening in addition to some nice maps of Beringea and East Asia during the LGM that I'm waiting on.
Digit, I am acutely aware of my mistakes, particularly since my stroke.Digit wrote: It isn't, it's moving north relative to the eastern land mass, a typo on my part, like EP I reserve the right to make mistakes, the difference between us is I know it.