Tectonic Striae

Here's where you get off topic and off center....Keep it nice, keep it clean, no sniping, no flaming. After that, anything goes.

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Rokcet Scientist

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Digit wrote:
We know how precise those are!
Better or worse than your own?
Neither.
But I don't have the bald-faced gall to write it into a headline in New Scientist, etc., as if it's etched in stone.
dannan14
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by dannan14 »

Hehe, did i say a page or two ago that the oldest parts of the ocean's crust were at most a few hundred million years old? Funny how that escaped ya RS.
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

dannan14 wrote:Hehe, did i say a page or two ago that the oldest parts of the ocean's crust were at most a few hundred million years old? Funny how that escaped ya RS.
No it didn't, my friend. I'm waiting for adequate support of your outspoken position. Until then it's just that: your position, afaic.
dannan14
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by dannan14 »

Rokcet Scientist wrote:
dannan14 wrote:Hehe, did i say a page or two ago that the oldest parts of the ocean's crust were at most a few hundred million years old? Funny how that escaped ya RS.
No it didn't, my friend. I'm waiting for adequate support of your outspoken position. Until then it's just that: your position, afaic.
Yeah, i said it. It's on page 2.

http://topex.ucsd.edu/es10/lectures/lec ... agemap.gif

It also happens to be the position of Dietmar Muller and those other cool guys that drill holes in the rocks to see what's there.
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Pretty map.
Unfortunately lo-res and specifically uninformative where it matters.

Let's see those cool guys drill near a couple subduction zones.

In drill cores, age is a function of depth.
Just because they couldn't get any deeper doesn't mean there's nothing older beyond. To the contrary. It virtually guarantees that what's beyond is older.
dannan14
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by dannan14 »

Well, then, maybe you should read up on oceanic crust formation at mid ocean ridges.
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

dannan14 wrote:Well, then, maybe you should read up on oceanic crust formation at mid ocean ridges.
If I were looking for rocks of "at most a few hundred million years old", I should. But it so happens we're discussing much older rock here that you specifically won't find around mid ocean ridges!
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Digit »

Where would you find rock of sufficient age?

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Digit wrote:Where would you find rock of sufficient age?
I wouldn't know until we find it, of course. But I would go looking near subduction zones.
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Digit »

Logic would suggest that any rock of that age has already been subducted.

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Digit wrote:Logic would suggest that any rock of that age has already been subducted.
But if it hasn't yet, that's the place I would expect to find it. Not in/on/under a mid-ocean ridge. That's where 'new' rock emerges from the mantle.
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Digit »

Well just to clarify a point, striae are not the result simply of expansion, they are the result of friction between two moving faces, that all. Grooves, in other words.

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Digit wrote:Well just to clarify a point, striae are not the result simply of expansion, they are the result of friction between two moving faces, that all. Grooves, in other words.
No, they are the result of being pushed up, expanded.
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Digit »

Why does pushing up mean expansion?

Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Rokcet Scientist

Re: Tectonic Striae

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Digit wrote:Why does pushing up mean expansion?
I'll leave that to you to figure out.
Post Reply