Page 23 of 61
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:09 am
by Beagle
In terms of the whole war - I agree. I've seen shows that depict one battle (Washingtons' crossing of the Delaware for instance) that are first rate.
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:46 am
by Minimalist
I guess I had never realized how much rank stupidity contributed to the British defeat. Some of the proclamations they issued were counterproductive beyond belief.
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:51 am
by marduk
well to be fair our commander in chief was stark raring mad and half the time believed he was an aardvark
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:36 am
by Minimalist
You were still lucky in that, unlike modern Aardvark's (George W. Bush) your commanders were separated by enough time and distance to be able to act independently in tactical situations. Moreover, no one could accuse old George of not giving his commanders an adequate force to deal with the problem.
But on several occasions those commanders issued inflammatory proclamations which infuriated the rebels, cowed the Tories and forced the non-commited to get off te fence.
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:07 pm
by marduk
Moreover, no one could accuse old George of not giving his commanders an adequate force to deal with the problem.
no youre right
it was not an adequate supply of troops ships and weapons that he failed to provide
and anyway min
america didn't exist offically until after the war
so claiming "yayay the americans won" is a blatant falsehood
everyone was english
who did you think would lose
besides which
you guys sided with the french which is the only reason you had any successes
and you guys have to live with that
har har

btw i've watched "the patriot" and "glory" so i know what i'm talking about"
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:14 pm
by Minimalist
Vive L'France!
I thought Patriot was one of the worst movies ever made. Glory wasn't bad until they got carried away at the end.
Topic???
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:16 pm
by MichelleH
And the Revolutionary War has what to do with Giza?
Guys, start a "Revolutionary War" thread, but in the mean time, let's get back to Giza.
Thanks!
MichelleH
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:24 pm
by Minimalist
Nothing's going on with Giza.
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:07 pm
by Frank Harrist
People were trying to figure out what part of the revolutionary war took place at Giza.

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:53 pm
by Minimalist
After the Brits were thrown out of N/A they went and occupied Egypt.
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:56 pm
by Frank Harrist
That was the French.
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:57 pm
by Minimalist
The Brits chased the French there and after winning the Battle of the Nile figured they'd just stick around and loot the whole country.
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:21 pm
by marduk
which movie was this again ?

Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:35 am
by Beagle
Beagle wrote:http://www.pyramidofman.com/Plugs/
There was a lot of speculation as to what was behind Gatenbrinks' Door in the GP. Even Z. Hawass had a few wild ideas of his own. The issue died quickly when it was shown that only another small "room" was on the other side.
This article provides a good account and some further speculation.
When we get a chance, I think this "door" is more interesting than meets the eye. There is a reason the shafts were built. And there must be a reason their existence was hidden.
Just keepin' it alive.
reply
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:39 am
by Guest
Wild shot in the dark here (

) - a method to relieve the load bearing down from above?
Apologies if it's been mentioned before....