Page 24 of 55

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:07 pm
by Minimalist
Again. That semi circular notch is present.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:10 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
deleted

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:12 pm
by Minimalist
Bark scraper?

Instead of hitting the branch, use it like a plane?

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:40 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
deleted

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:49 pm
by Minimalist
Another test? That is if you have one you are willing to risk.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:57 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
deleted

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:07 pm
by Minimalist
Just pick one. It will either scrape the bark away or not.

Also...bark would be a useful commodity by itself, would it not. Scrape it off in long thin strips and use it to make rope? That would have to be useful to primitive people who most likely were not as wasteful as we are today.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:32 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
deleted

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:39 pm
by Rokcet Scientist
Minimalist wrote:Just pick one. It will either scrape the bark away or not.

Also...bark would be a useful commodity by itself, would it not. Scrape it off in long thin strips and use it to make rope? That would have to be useful to primitive people who most likely were not as wasteful as we are today.
Or long thin strips could be used for basket weaving, or other carry-alls?
And dried out (a matter of days) they are excellent kindling for fire making!
Very useful commodity, those long thin strips of bark. You don't throw that away.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:47 pm
by Minimalist
You know, Charlie, Rokcet makes me think that making spears might have been the lesser use. The bark might have been more valuable for day-to-day survival activities. After all, you can reuse spears.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:09 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
deleted

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:30 pm
by Minimalist
Image


The idea answers a question that's been bugging me based on the sheer volume of tools you have turned up. If they were in more or less constant use for day-to-day activities it would explain the volume.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:36 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
deleted

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:42 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
deleted

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:07 pm
by Minimalist
Just Eff'ing Great.