Archaeologica.org

wow,he went to the comics page to get his next round of evidence... how scientific. it isn't even archaeology and you have the nerve to yell at me for using a book that has been around since antiquity?...and has led many to marvelous archaeological discoveries?

what a hypocrite.

archaeologist wrote:wow,he went to the comics page to get his next round of evidence... how scientific. it isn't even archaeology and you have the nerve to yell at me for using a book that has been around since antiquity?...and has led many to marvelous archaeological discoveries?

what a hypocrite.

He went a bit wild.
This one, however, is extremely relevant:


There have been other books around since antiquity also, some older, eg Homer's stories. The fact that there is some truth in them does not prove that they are true.

This one, however, is extremely relevant:

that is assuming that the scientists discovered the facts. what they have found is usually oinly a iece of the puzzle and how they draw thier conclusions again is based upon what options they have rejected, what options they favor, and even with countless analysis, the best they can come up wth is: 'we think...' 'we believe...' 'it is possible...' 'this is what we think...'

science is very limited and when people base their conclsions on things they cannot verify then we have no facts at all. case in point, the fossil record...not one scientist can verify that what they propose as transitions really took place as stated.

yet they are willing to stake their careers on such flimsy evidence. nor can they really prove which is the mother/father and which is the daughter/son in the process.

evolutionists antics and what they hang their hat on is far less than what creationists have and it gets to be comical reading what they think tookplace.

another thing about the fossil record is that scientists are always ready to proclaim new evidence yet they do not even take into account that fossils do not fossilize in exactly the same position. what they claim to be a predecessor may have had its wing or foot tucked under their bodies when fossilized given rise to mis-identification.

agai, i submit that the only reason evolution survives today is that it is an alternative to the Bible and if evolution was true then those that support it would not be threatened by intelligent design, creation or any other theory. nor would they care if alternatives were taught in the science classroom for they would know that all other theories were wrong.

but as it stands, evolutionists act like spoiled babies crying to get their own way or hiding when the heat is on or they play the bully to force people to give themwhat they want. basically your all a joke, but you don't realize it.

Archaeologist, I don't think anything you wrote is correct.

Science doesn't 'verify', it tries to give the best possible explanation for the evidence. It doesn't prove things to be true (mathematics/formal logic does that but in the real world you have to deal with the evidence you have).

Evoolution is the only scientific way to explain not only the fossil record but what we can see today as new species are created (yes, it's still happening and being observed). You can try to explain it by magic/religon but that isn't science. The reason why people worry about Creationism in its various guises is that it is fundamentally anti-science -- your own post shows that -- and encourages people to think that science is just guesswork or worse. If Americans turn away from science America will become a third world country. If Korea had done that it wouldn't be as advanced and modern a country as it has become (my nephew spent several years in Korea, just came back a month ago).

archaeologist wrote:wow,he went to the comics page to get his next round of evidence... how scientific. it isn't even archaeology and you have the nerve to yell at me for using a book that has been around since antiquity?...and has led many to marvelous archaeological discoveries?

what a hypocrite.

What makes you think that you deserve "evidence?" You deserve to be ridiculed.