Archaeologica.org

BTW, there does seem to be an Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority.


http://www.egsma.gov.eg/default2.htm

At some point you get hoisted by your own petard

i think that i would take RK's word over ciko's over even yours, mini. she has raised many points that none of you have considered as most of you are worried about pictures being placed on the site.

nothing has been discovered that even remotely proves or demonstrates that this is a pyramid let alone the age of what is there.

so far all that has been given is a slick p.r. campaign to convince people that os is right, but there is nothing of substance to back up the claim that is made.

the way ciko tells it, he says the egyptian 'expert' confirmed what os has said yet when you look at what RK posted as his real words, you can see a vast difference betweeen the two and the site is NOT confirmed as a pyramid.

as for my believing the Bible without evidence that is a lie. i have presented much evidence for my belief thus i am using evidence along with faith and reason.

You do understand what your opinion is worth, don't you?

You have presented shit, arch.

You have presented shit, arch.

You do understand what your opinion is worth, don't you

i doubt it and more than yours. your conitual contribution to each and every topic certainly waters down and discredits yours.

new sond opened, on the south side of the pyramid

first stone blocks on the south side





now we have , stone blocks on north, east and south side

Those are boulders; no more, no less.

But boulders stacked up in the correct order might be pyramids!

Oh, YEAH!!! I forgot!

now we have , stone blocks on north, east and south side

how do we know which side of the hill they are on?? how do we know those aren't the same pictures you have been recycling over and over agian.

these pictures show very little and they certainly do not prove a pyramid. at best all they show is some ambitious person was trying to keep the dirt in one spot so they could garden the slope.

living in a tiny country in the orient allows one to see all types of construction when it pertains to hills and hillsides and there is not enough exposed to warrant any conclusion.

from what i see is an attempt to keep the financing rolling in.

how do we know which side of the hill they are on?? how do we know those aren't the same pictures you have been recycling over and over agian.

Some things you have to take on FAITH, arch.....I thought you were a master of that?

Some things you have to take on FAITH, arch.....I thought you were a master of that?

their evidence doesn't back up their claims.

Neither does yours.

I think it's been pretty difficult to get a good 3D perspective on many of these pictures. But this last group that Ciko sent - the third picture down - really shows the incline of the hill and the size of the rock being uncovered.

I am believing now that the area has been altered in a dramatic way by humans. In a few years there may be people saying that it had to be extraterrestrial, but I'm sticking with humans.