Page 4 of 6
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 6:12 pm
by Beagle
Charlie Hatchett wrote:Where are the pics of Beags?!?!?!
Did you have the opportunity to get some close-ups of the axe, Beags?
Was this the first axe they've found, or are there others. We wouldn't have known about this one if you weren't there.
Good week to be there, ey!!

The first pic I posted about the hand axe has me looking at it. As usual, I'm jabbering instead of looking at the camera. I think there will be more of me as we all exchanged email addresses and said we would email pics. Naturally I didn't take any of myself, but when Tom Patera came over with the hand axe my wife took a shot.
Charlie they have found one other Topper Chopper at the site. Tools like that are unusual here since man did not reside here as far as anyone can tell. Topper is a large outcropping of chert with a Pleistocene Terrace. So it's mainly a tool factory. But there is so much to learn from that.
I think I'm going to get some more pics of the hand axe. I'm sending people pics that I got of them working, so I'll ask for anything they have on the axe.
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 6:22 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
Beagle wrote:Charlie Hatchett wrote:Where are the pics of Beags?!?!?!
Did you have the opportunity to get some close-ups of the axe, Beags?
Was this the first axe they've found, or are there others. We wouldn't have known about this one if you weren't there.
Good week to be there, ey!!

The first pic I posted about the hand axe has me looking at it. As usual, I'm jabbering instead of looking at the camera. I think there will be more of me as we all exchanged email addresses and said we would email pics. Naturally I didn't take any of myself, but when Tom Patera came over with the hand axe my wife took a shot.
Charlie they have found one other Topper Chopper at the site. Tools like that are unusual here since man did not reside here as far as anyone can tell. Topper is a large outcropping of chert with a Pleistocene Terrace. So it's mainly a tool factory. But there is so much to learn from that.
I think I'm going to get some more pics of the hand axe. I'm sending people pics that I got of them working, so I'll ask for anything they have on the axe.
Great, Beags!!
See if you can confirm from which strata the axe was recovered.
Another chopper like tool was recovered from the 16-20k strata.
My guess is they were working in the 50,000 B.P. + strata, but it would be good to know for sure.
You definitely came back bearing good news!!
Thanks for sharing, Bro!
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:22 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
Hey Beags.
You should post this info over at Virginia's site, also (under preClovis). She'll be thrilled to death.

Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:32 pm
by Beagle
Charlie, the axe came in pre-clovis. However, we were nowhere near the pleistocene terrace pit, where they have the 50,000BP evidence.
I got a private tour of that place though. I'll see what pics I get and tell everyone all about it.
Also, I first heard about Firestones' theory from Virginias' post, and then read more about it. It seemed pretty far out at the time. Then at Topper I find that Al Goodyear will present the theory, along with other scientists in Acapulco next Thursday.
When that happens the story will be in Time, Nat'l Geo, and everywhere. When Al told me this on Tues. night, I went nuts not being able to get to a computer. We didn't even have cell phone service.
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:41 pm
by Minimalist
We didn't even have cell phone service.
Positively pleistocene!!!
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:42 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
Minimalist wrote:We didn't even have cell phone service.
Positively pleistocene!!!

Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:44 pm
by Minimalist
Beagle wrote:Charlie, the axe came in pre-clovis. However, we were nowhere near the pleistocene terrace pit, where they have the 50,000BP evidence.
I got a private tour of that place though. I'll see what pics I get and tell everyone all about it.
Also, I first heard about Firestones' theory from Virginias' post, and then read more about it. It seemed pretty far out at the time. Then at Topper I find that Al Goodyear will present the theory, along with other scientists in Acapulco next Thursday.
When that happens the story will be in Time, Nat'l Geo, and everywhere. When Al told me this on Tues. night, I went nuts not being able to get to a computer. We didn't even have cell phone service.
You mean this?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story ... 85,00.html
Diamonds tell tale of comet that killed off the cavemen
Fireballs set half the planet ablaze, wiping out the mammoth and America's Stone Age hunters
Robin McKie, science editor
Sunday May 20, 2007
The Observer
Scientists will outline dramatic evidence this week that suggests a comet exploded over the Earth nearly 13,000 years ago, creating a hail of fireballs that set fire to most of the northern hemisphere.
Primitive Stone Age cultures were destroyed and populations of mammoths and other large land animals, such as the mastodon, were wiped out. The blast also caused a major bout of climatic cooling that lasted 1,000 years and seriously disrupted the development of the early human civilisations that were emerging in Europe and Asia.
'This comet set off a shock wave that changed Earth profoundly,' said Arizona geophysicist Allen West. 'It was about 2km-3km in diameter and broke up just before impact, setting off a series of explosions, each the equivalent of an atomic bomb blast. The result would have been hell on Earth. Most of the northern hemisphere would have been left on fire.'
The theory is to be outlined at the American Geophysical Union meeting in Acapulco, Mexico. A group of US scientists that include West will report that they have found a layer of microscopic diamonds at 26 different sites in Europe, Canada and America. These are the remains of a giant carbon-rich comet that crashed in pieces on our planet 12,900 years ago, they say. The huge pressures and heat triggered by the fragments crashing to Earth turned the comet's carbon into diamond dust. 'The shock waves and the heat would have been tremendous,' said West. 'It would have set fire to animals' fur and to the clothing worn by men and women. The searing heat would have also set fire to the grasslands of the northern hemisphere. Great grazing animals like the mammoth that had survived the original blast would later have died in their thousands from starvation. Only animals, including humans, that had a wide range of food would have survived the aftermath.'
The scientists point out that archaeological evidence shows that early Stone Age cultures clearly suffered serious setbacks at this time. In particular, American Stone Age hunters, descendants of the hunter-gatherers who had migrated to the continent from Asia, vanished around this time.
These people were some of the fiercest hunters on Earth, men and women who made magnificent stone spearheads which they used to hunt animals including the mammoth. Their disappearance at this time has been a cause of intense debate, with climate change being put forward as a key explanation. Now there is a new idea: the first Americans were killed by a comet.
It was not just America that bore the brunt of the comet crash. At this time, the Earth was emerging from the last Ice Age. The climate was slowly warming, though extensive ice fields still covered higher latitudes. The disintegrating comet would have plunged into these ice sheets, causing widespread melting. These waters would have poured into the Atlantic, disrupting its currents, including the Gulf stream. The long-term effect was a 1,000-year cold spell that hit Europe and Asia.
The comet theory, backed by observational evidence collected by the team, has excited considerable attention from other researchers, following publication of an outline report of the work in Nature
'The magnitude of this discovery is so important,' team member James Kennett, of the University of California, Santa Barbara, told the journal. 'It explains three of the highest-debated controversies of recent decades.'
These are the sudden disappearance of the first Stone Age people of America, the disappearance of mammoths throughout much of Europe and America and the sudden cooling of the planet, an event known as the Younger-Dryas period. Various theories have been put forward to explain these occurrences, but now scientists believe they have found a common cause in a comet crash. However, the idea is still controversial and the theory is bedevilled by problems in obtaining accurate dates for the different events.
'We still have a long way to go,' admitted West. 'But we have a great deal of evidence, from many sites, so this is quite a powerful case that we are making.'
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:51 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
Also, I first heard about Firestones' theory from Virginias' post, and then read more about it. It seemed pretty far out at the time.
Yeah, she seems to stay right on top of things, and her stuff does seem wacko a first glance. Guess that's the nature of being on the edge. It appears more and more scientists are seeing the plausibility of the hypothesis. Virginia has also found handaxes, in Wyoming:
http://cayman.globat.com/~bandstexas.co ... ndaxes.pdf
These finds were ignored until recently. Here's a formal report concerning the handaxes and associated stratigraphy:
http://cayman.globat.com/~bandstexas.com/Pinedale.pdf
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:59 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
You mean this?
This is Firestone's book:
Firestone, R., A. West, and S. Warwick-Smith, 2006, THE CYCLE OF COSMIC CATASTROPHES: FLOOD, FIRE, AND FAMINE IN THE HISTORY OF CIVILIZATION, Bear Company, Rochester, Vermont, 392 pp, ISBN 10:1-59143-061-5.
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:00 pm
by Beagle
Minimalist wrote:Beagle wrote:Charlie, the axe came in pre-clovis. However, we were nowhere near the pleistocene terrace pit, where they have the 50,000BP evidence.
I got a private tour of that place though. I'll see what pics I get and tell everyone all about it.
Also, I first heard about Firestones' theory from Virginias' post, and then read more about it. It seemed pretty far out at the time. Then at Topper I find that Al Goodyear will present the theory, along with other scientists in Acapulco next Thursday.
When that happens the story will be in Time, Nat'l Geo, and everywhere. When Al told me this on Tues. night, I went nuts not being able to get to a computer. We didn't even have cell phone service.
You mean this?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story ... 85,00.html
Diamonds tell tale of comet that killed off the cavemen
Fireballs set half the planet ablaze, wiping out the mammoth and America's Stone Age hunters
Robin McKie, science editor
Sunday May 20, 2007
The Observer
Scientists will outline dramatic evidence this week that suggests a comet exploded over the Earth nearly 13,000 years ago, creating a hail of fireballs that set fire to most of the northern hemisphere.
Primitive Stone Age cultures were destroyed and populations of mammoths and other large land animals, such as the mastodon, were wiped out. The blast also caused a major bout of climatic cooling that lasted 1,000 years and seriously disrupted the development of the early human civilisations that were emerging in Europe and Asia.
'This comet set off a shock wave that changed Earth profoundly,' said Arizona geophysicist Allen West. 'It was about 2km-3km in diameter and broke up just before impact, setting off a series of explosions, each the equivalent of an atomic bomb blast. The result would have been hell on Earth. Most of the northern hemisphere would have been left on fire.'
The theory is to be outlined at the American Geophysical Union meeting in Acapulco, Mexico. A group of US scientists that include West will report that they have found a layer of microscopic diamonds at 26 different sites in Europe, Canada and America. These are the remains of a giant carbon-rich comet that crashed in pieces on our planet 12,900 years ago, they say. The huge pressures and heat triggered by the fragments crashing to Earth turned the comet's carbon into diamond dust. 'The shock waves and the heat would have been tremendous,' said West. 'It would have set fire to animals' fur and to the clothing worn by men and women. The searing heat would have also set fire to the grasslands of the northern hemisphere. Great grazing animals like the mammoth that had survived the original blast would later have died in their thousands from starvation. Only animals, including humans, that had a wide range of food would have survived the aftermath.'
The scientists point out that archaeological evidence shows that early Stone Age cultures clearly suffered serious setbacks at this time. In particular, American Stone Age hunters, descendants of the hunter-gatherers who had migrated to the continent from Asia, vanished around this time.
These people were some of the fiercest hunters on Earth, men and women who made magnificent stone spearheads which they used to hunt animals including the mammoth. Their disappearance at this time has been a cause of intense debate, with climate change being put forward as a key explanation. Now there is a new idea: the first Americans were killed by a comet.
It was not just America that bore the brunt of the comet crash. At this time, the Earth was emerging from the last Ice Age. The climate was slowly warming, though extensive ice fields still covered higher latitudes. The disintegrating comet would have plunged into these ice sheets, causing widespread melting. These waters would have poured into the Atlantic, disrupting its currents, including the Gulf stream. The long-term effect was a 1,000-year cold spell that hit Europe and Asia.
The comet theory, backed by observational evidence collected by the team, has excited considerable attention from other researchers, following publication of an outline report of the work in Nature
'The magnitude of this discovery is so important,' team member James Kennett, of the University of California, Santa Barbara, told the journal. 'It explains three of the highest-debated controversies of recent decades.'
These are the sudden disappearance of the first Stone Age people of America, the disappearance of mammoths throughout much of Europe and America and the sudden cooling of the planet, an event known as the Younger-Dryas period. Various theories have been put forward to explain these occurrences, but now scientists believe they have found a common cause in a comet crash. However, the idea is still controversial and the theory is bedevilled by problems in obtaining accurate dates for the different events.
'We still have a long way to go,' admitted West. 'But we have a great deal of evidence, from many sites, so this is quite a powerful case that we are making.'
Yep - that's the one Min. Al Goodyear et al will call for further study. It's getting support.

Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:08 pm
by Minimalist
Interesting idea.
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:10 pm
by Beagle
This artifact remains in situ protruding from the wall at the clovis/pre-clovis level.
Anyone care to speculate? It will come out this week. It seems to have a definate edge. Sorry I don't have a better picture.
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:10 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
Interesting idea.
Sure is. They've found mammoth tusks peppered, and penetrated with the supernova remnants.

Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:14 pm
by Beagle
Interesting idea
I don't know Min. I guess we've both wondered about all these things for many years. This is like someone yelling out in the theatre that the butler did it.
Pretty soon it will explain the pyramids, Noahs flood, Atlantis, etc. What are we to do then?

Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:20 pm
by Charlie Hatchett
Beagle wrote:
This artifact remains in situ protruding from the wall at the clovis/pre-clovis level.
Anyone care to speculate? It will come out this week. It seems to have a definate edge. Sorry I don't have a better picture.
Here's what appear to be flake channels outlined:
If it turns out to be bifacial and symmetrical, it will be a dead ringer for a classic handaxe. So, to clarify, does the piece lay below the Clovis level?