Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:14 pm
Where'dja git them there emoticons ye got there, Bob?Minimalist wrote:
Archaeologica.org
Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
Into to the history of matriarchy
Page 4 of 4
off topic
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:54 pm
Those emoticons are perfect! Where indeed??
BUt...
I'm as guilty as anybody, but let's get back to archaeology!
These other topics belong on other forums or other threads anyway.
DB has her own website.
Furthermore, I vote for toning down the language....that little poem was, in
my opinion, gratuitous as well as indecent, too much &$^$%# and @#$&.
BUt...
I'm as guilty as anybody, but let's get back to archaeology!
These other topics belong on other forums or other threads anyway.
DB has her own website.
Furthermore, I vote for toning down the language....that little poem was, in
my opinion, gratuitous as well as indecent, too much &$^$%# and @#$&.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:20 pm
I thought the poem was kinda funny. But, this isn't the place for it.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:28 pm
Oh guys, are we finally going to dump that femminist crap and get back to discussing archaeology? The only good parts on this thread are what you guys have to say, I stopped reading her stuff long ago.
Maybe she really Jean Marie in disguise with a new bone to pick.
Who is it that wants to discuss the First Americans? That sounds like a good topic.
Maybe she really Jean Marie in disguise with a new bone to pick.
Who is it that wants to discuss the First Americans? That sounds like a good topic.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:40 pm
I'm game! You start.Leona Conner wrote:Oh guys, are we finally going to dump that femminist crap and get back to discussing archaeology? The only good parts on this thread are what you guys have to say, I stopped reading her stuff long ago.
Maybe she really Jean Marie in disguise with a new bone to pick.
Who is it that wants to discuss the First Americans? That sounds like a good topic.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:25 pm
You're a enthusiastic theorist.Anonymous wrote:Let's see. A week has 168 hours, now if he took at least 8 hours a day for eating and resting (after all he would need to keep his energy up) that would take 56 hours. He would still have over 100 hours in the week to do his best on 100 females, that's an hour per girl. Hell most men I've met need only 5 minutes to do their part.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:42 pm
Anonymous wrote:Where'dja git them there emoticons ye got there, Bob?Minimalist wrote:
Oh, I belong to other message boards, several of them devoted to the sport of ice hockey in general or the New York Rangers in particular. Those boards tend to be, how shall we say, a little more free-wheeling than this. In fact, on one of them, that poem would be put in the Children's Section.
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:09 pm
Thanks RC (I think). I was at work again didn't log on. I kinda to that stuff for a living.