Page 4 of 77

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:58 am
by Frank Harrist
I don't hold out a lot of hope for this supposed pyramid, but I do think that it should be investigated further if Osmaogich can come up with funding and permits and stuff I say let him go for it and let the Egyptologists weigh in on it and debunk or support the theory. Hey, it ain't costin' me nothin'. It's interesting. I agree with Bob that it needs further investigation by an unbiased independent team. Guest, I like your enthusiasm almost as much as your "accent". :wink:

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:04 pm
by Minimalist
This picture, unless it has been doctored,

Image

looks like a man-made structure to me, though.

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:23 pm
by Frank Harrist
The thing that bothers me about it is the location. Why build such a monumental structure on such a slope? That would just increase the difficulty of the job. Most pyramids I've seen were on level ground. In fact all of 'em! I'm keeping an open mind about this, but it don't look too promising. Keep us posted, guest. And while you're at it, why don't you register so we can call you something besides guest. Don't let the cynical old farts scare you off. :D

reply

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:14 pm
by RK Awl-O'Gist
According to Osmanagich's own website, he says that the locals turned a natural hill into a pyramid by reshaping it, and building where necessary. Doesn't that shoot his own theory about it being a 'pyramid' down in flames?!

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:14 pm
by Minimalist
Look at the other hills, though.

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:25 pm
by Guest
No-one suggested you were Osmanagich...you just seem overkeen to fight his battles for him....
no dont battle for anyone, but i am convinced what i have saw, all this evidence

The thing that bothers me about it is the location.
/ why, bosnia is perfect place for this bacause

1. bosnia is naturally rich country, a lot of water :wink:
2. bosnia was great country, it was bigger than it is now , and powerfull
3. last year german archelogists found 24 000 neolithic artifacts around pyramid in that area , Visoko , they where 7000 years old

According to Osmanagich's own website, he says that the locals turned a natural hill into a pyramid by reshaping it, and building where necessary. Doesn't that shoot his own theory about it being a 'pyramid' down in flames?!
this is not truth , the media said this :? i have talked whit osmanagich about this he said that there is stone construction under the hill
media missunderstood many things :?

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:53 am
by Ciko
Guest = Ciko :D now you know

here , websites about this pyramid

official website http://www.piramidasunca.ba/
unnofficial website http://www.bosnianpyramid.com/ english

Re: reply

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:31 am
by Minimalist
RK Awl-O'Gist wrote:According to Osmanagich's own website, he says that the locals turned a natural hill into a pyramid by reshaping it, and building where necessary. Doesn't that shoot his own theory about it being a 'pyramid' down in flames?!


Why would it? It would still have served the function. Someone would still have had to organize the effort which would mean some sort of 'civilization' existing. The most convincing argument I have seen for Yonaguni is that it was a natural structure which was adapted by humans.

reply

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:22 am
by RK Awl-O'Gist
Nonsense. According to those websites, Osmanagich has already decided that it's the 'first European pyramid' before it has even been excavated. What's the betting that his next find is the 'Bosnian Stonehenge'?!

reply

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:46 am
by RK Awl-O'Gist
Anonymous wrote:some media said it is 10 000, some 7000 some 15 000 :? , but osmanagich never said that this pyramid is so old
That's a blatant lie; if you go to the 'Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun' site, and click on the 'pyramid' section, Osmanagich says twice (in questions 3 & 14) that the 'pyramids' in Bosnia were built before the end of the last Ice Age.
The place has yet to be excavated, and he can apparently state that for a fact. That kind of suggests the whole 'story' is so much bullshit! :lol:

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:47 am
by Frank Harrist
Can we just call him Ossy or something? It's too long to write it out every time. I honestly hope it's a man-made pyramid, but I doubt it. It would be cool.

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:26 pm
by Minimalist
Frank Harrist wrote:Can we just call him Ossy or something? It's too long to write it out every time. I honestly hope it's a man-made pyramid, but I doubt it. It would be cool.

HOw about?


Image

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:28 pm
by Tech
Quote from one of their sites

The hill is constructed using sandstone slabs that are buried 17 feet below the surface.---- Sandstone is not indigenous to the area-----,

I dont know how to substiate this but if correct , then it must be the best evidence of it being man made

Re: reply

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:36 pm
by Minimalist
RK Awl-O'Gist wrote:Nonsense. According to those websites, Osmanagich has already decided that it's the 'first European pyramid' before it has even been excavated. What's the betting that his next find is the 'Bosnian Stonehenge'?!


Lets be fair, OZ claims to have excavated it. What we all want to see is INDEPENDENT confirmation.

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:01 pm
by Minimalist
Is anyone else having trouble with this board today?