Archaeologica.org

Somethimes I think a few get stoned before they come here.

Starflower wrote:Now, now minimalist, the ones they don't like were stoned before they got there.

That's a cool church you've got there, Star!

well, first, welcome to the arena.

as - drumroll, envelope opened, and - the first recognizable paleo-wiccan (there are some pretty obvious continuities between paleo-l culture and what gary snyder called the outcroppings of the paleo in modren, industrial culture). to my mind, wicca is one of those outcroppings.

i'm more in tune with mercea eliade and shamanic gaiamorphology. perhaps a difference without a distinction.


for all

read 'the special view of history" by charles olson published 1970 by oyez, berkeley.


john

You won't make it here if you're too normal. Luckily "normal female" is an oxymoron. IT WAS A JOKE! Jeeeeez! (Freudian slip I guess but I had written "lickily" intead of "luckily".) It's early for me.

archaeologist wrote:still bitter huh frank?

Arch is the religious nut

anyways, frank and the others just don't like being proven wrong or shown where their holes are.

Look who suddenly develops selective amnesia

welcome back RK, i wondered what happened to you. just ignore marduk, i try to. the only good thinghe has done is divert theattention from me,which gives me a break.

What have I got to be bitter about? I look forward to the next crazy thing you say. You're entertaining at least. I have come to regard you as a joke so nothing you say can piss me off any more. I am amazed at the so called holes you so smugly point out. It's like you're hallucinating or something.

Look who suddenly develops selective amnesia

its ok theres no need to explain your total miscomprehension of the facts and inability to provide links that back up your erroneous belief system publically

Says the "man" who spouts crap as historical fact, and then waffles, bullshits and hurls abuse because a) He's been caught and KNOWS he can't prove any of it and b) he's not man enough just to admit being wrong. Welcome to Planet Marduk.

welcome to planet pretend RK Awl-O'Gist where you can post one link by a historian where she admits she doesn't know and then claim that as proof that you do
the planet where all other links are unacceptable and where you can decide not to answer the difficult questions as to why two groups you claim are the same speak a different language

the place where you can accuse other people of being abusive while you are actually using abusive language in saying it
the place where you can pretend you are qualified to do something and not need to prove it because you think that because you said it thats enough.

RK this links for you
http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/ ... alth/fs/en
roflmao

Thanks for the welcome all. If you have to be the odd side to fit here, I should fell right at home....I've never accused of being in the
norm"....thank goodness!

As to the http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2.asp site....what a crock! There is no evidence to support it at all.....there is however, rock hard solid evidence to support the finds mankind has dating evidence into the millions of years. Much of the bibles stories are actually much, much older, found in other areas and cultures anyway......and most of the good reading are in the books that man decided to leave out of what is the current bible. Of course one will not see any of it if their eyes are wide shut!

I like you, LadyV!

Much of the bibles stories are actually much, much older, found in other areas and cultures anyway

all of the old testament stories are set in mesopotamia with one exception
the one exception is believed by anyone credible who's ever examined it to be complete fiction

Marduk,
It would fit you better to post some evidence to "prove" your ridiculous claims that the Celts arrived in Britain c2000BC and found the Picts already there, that the Picts built all the passage tombs in Britain etc etc.
And as for your demand to know where I was working currently-that's called stalking....
Anyway, I dare say LadyV will successfully slap you down on occasion too.

i didnt claim the celts were in britain in 2000bce
just that the picts were
and as for evidence
you havent posted anything yet
just your consistent abusive language
you think thats worth anything

and no its not stalking but claiming it is stalking is a rather shallow attempt at diversion
you could easily prove you were qualified
but you have completely failed to do so on every chance offered to you.
i wasn't trying to find out what you were working on at the moment
I already know you work in a supermarket


and way to go at hijacking this totally unrelated thread with more of your abuse
hope your really proud of yourself

I dare say LadyV will successfully slap you down on occasion too

I'm sure she knows all about you from your last three posts already
you think shed take sides on the strength of that
from what i've seen from her so far shes no dummy
what makes you think that she'd side with someone who posts abuse, responds with abuse and then makes personal attacks on other posters as a form of greeting

As to the http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2.asp site....what a crock!

Yes, dear....but our president believes it!

[quote]Quote:
As to the http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2.asp site....what a crock!

Yes, dear....but our president believes it! [/quote]

[size=18]Unfortunately, entirely too many people believe it.[/size]