Archaeologica.org

Marduk, do you actually think many of those ancient kings did not rule contenporaneously from their respective city-states of lower Mesopotamia? Apparently, you think so, very ignorant of you. (Same story with Manetho's list for Egypt.)

And ten of those kings were from before the Deluge, says so in those ancient records, oh no!

"Catlicks" and "dynamite waist-coats?" What do you consider to be a dynamite waist-coat, what color, material, cut, etc., and do catlicks relate to the wonderful waist-coat of which you seem so fond?

[quote="archaeologist"][quote]don't bother, you have no credibility nor are there any such people as neanderthals.

if you had answered the questions maybe marduk and minimalist wouldn't have posted in this thread in such a fashion. what i asked were legitmate inquiries looking for more information which none of you could supply.

how do you expect to have a discussion if all you get are rubber stamped replies? then how can you expect people to take you seriously if you cannot defend your theory or provide answers to simple questions.[/quote]

If you want to question anyone credibility, look in the mirror. You say we have no proof that Neandertals existed, yet there are many, many pieces of evidence. You, on the other hand, have yet to prove BY EVIDENCE, that they did not exist.

And talk about rubber stamping replies. "No proof," "lacking evidence," "just evolutionist conjecture," "not reputable [reference, historian, fill in with whatever], etc. Standard reply to our questions (that is if we get an answer) yet you almost demand that we give you an acceptable answer to your questions. Please inform us poor unbelievers just what constitutes an acceptable answer? Other than one that proves you Bible is correct, which our side knows is brimming with errors.

Marduk, do you actually think many of those ancient kings did not rule contenporaneously from their respective city-states of lower Mesopotamia? Apparently, you think so, very ignorant of you. (Same story with Manetho's list for Egypt.)

in the case of the sumerian king list which is a list of high kings no
it quite clearly states in most cases that the following king was the son of the previous one, the answer you delivered was an early church redaction to attempt to fit history into the 4004bce timeframe. it doesn't stand up under any scrutiny

And ten of those kings were from before the Deluge, says so in those ancient records, oh no!

it does does it ?
perhaps you could point out which kings they were so we can all share in your wisdom

"Catlicks" and "dynamite waist-coats?" What do you consider to be a dynamite waist-coat, what color, material, cut, etc., and do catlicks relate to the wonderful waist-coat of which you seem so fond?

well they were the ones who sponsored the musical
http://hem.passagen.se/musicals/images/ ... ydream.mid

Just google pre flood babylonian kings.

The link didn't download, so tell us about your favorite scene.

i like the bit when Pharoah starts singing
I was in a production at the oxford playhouse
I played Simeon
everyone hated the guy that played Joseph
precocious little *******

Just google pre flood babylonian kings.

well there you go you see
Babylon was a post flood ciilisation
so it had no pre flood kings
because it didn't exist then

I wonder from where they got the idea for the pre-Deluge kings? Oh, I guess it was from the Hebrews.

they werent around either Jim
this is going way too far off topic anyway
if you want a discussion on the mesopotamians then open a new thread
i'd love to enlighten you on a few things

i'm close enough to a publication date now not to have to worry about plaguiarism in some areas

Eber (Heber) lived during the hey-day of Sumer (Shumer).

Good man on the plagiarism, lest you sue them penniless.

i find that highly unlikely seeing as hes a son of shem
you're putting the cart well before the horse in that area

A science lesson for you to pick part

http://www.454.com/downloads/news-event ... _Sheet.pdf

http://www.454.com/downloads/news-event ... iology.pdf

http://www.454.com/downloads/news-event ... rticle.pdf


[img]http://www.454.com/img/content-design/N ... -small.jpg
The robust composite skeleton of a Neandertal (left) is unmistakably different from that of a modern human (right).

This is serious research done by serious scientists and if you cant post a reply without mentioning the bible or just saying they have it all wrong
then dont bother
[/img]

however, Neandertal is believed to have lacked the higher reasoning function of modern day humans.

That could explain the Fundis.

Perhaps there was some interbreeding or enclaves of Neaderthals migrated to the bible belt?

Just ask anyone living the the belt. We will attest to the fact that Neandertals are alive and well and interbreeding like crazy.

Just ask anyone living the the belt. We will attest to the fact that Neandertals are alive and well and interbreeding like crazy

that is why you , minimalist and others have no credibility as you confuse insults and other gutter remarks as credible defenses for your bigotry against those who disagree with you.

tech, your link's analysis seems to lean towards maintaining a superiority complex for modern man over ancient man:

The Neandertal is thought to have been reasonably sophisticated, forming
crews and burying its dead; however, Neandertal is believed to have
lacked the higher reasoning function of modern day humans.

tthen :

Neandertal is the closest relative to humans.

making them sub-human also verifies my point.

You do not deserve anything more than insults.


In fact, everytime you post bible bullshit you do nothing but insult everyone else's intelligence.

Adolf Hitler used the same tactics as the Darwinites here.