Archaeologica.org

So arch - you are trying to tell me you are an archaeologist? Remember it's a sin to lie.....

sorry, as everyone who has been on this board longer than two months know, i do not give out personal information on the computer.

now will address the textual confirmation i raiised or will you let someone else respond?

i have not heard that Kitchen has withdrawn that assessment nor have i heard anyone prove him wrong yet. you bring these statements out everytimne i prove my point and you fail to prove what you say.

Doesn't matter what he says. The science of archaeology has moved past him.

Kitchen should probably stick to bible-thumpers.


BTW, you have never 'proven' anything. All you ever do is post opinions of the bible crowd who have not got any physical evidence to sustain them.

archaeologist wrote:sorry, as everyone who has been on this board longer than two months know, i do not give out personal information on the computer.

now will address the textual confirmation i raiised or will you let someone else respond?

You are a student - you live in Korea. These pieces of personal info given feely by yourself in posts I have read since showing up here yesterday. I told you it was a sin to lie. Bearing false witness and all that.....

But see you expose yourself as a poser in your posts. Especially your tirade against Dr. Harris. You are ignorant of stratigraphic excavation technique. No archaeologist would be that in the dark. You are a poser here to disseminate Christian dogma. That's all. The common term is troll.

But see you expose yourself as a poser in your posts. Especially your tirade against Dr. Harris. You are ignorant of stratigraphic excavation technique. No archaeologist would be that in the dark. You are a poser here to disseminate Christian dogma. That's all. The common term is troll.

please don't assume as you really know very little as you ignore mitigating factors before jumping to a conclusion.

your desire to discredit me just hurts you as your posdts and what yu have to say suffer. this thread is not about me don't make me the issue.

Kitchen should probably stick to bible-thumpers

i have only read part of his book i got this week then i went out and ordered another one of his. he is that good. it is no wonder that he was never proven wrong when he showed the price of a slave at the reported amount recorded in the Bible.

Kitchen is very thorough and honest which is more than i can say about your favorites. i have a lecture of his which was also very good.

Oas, you are just a troll for Darwinian bilge, your dogma is tired, worn-out, and laughably specious, this is why your model looks so clueless next to the model with catastrophism integral to the equation.

Only fools, or the fooled, believe the uniformitarian/Darwinistic blather, so since your model as no explanatory power, you should stick around and learn more about how much your model really blows.

Genesis Veracity wrote:Oas, you are just a troll for Darwinian bilge, your dogma is tired, worn-out, and laughably specious, this is why your model looks so clueless next to the model with catastrophism integral to the equation.

Only fools, or the fooled, believe the uniformitarian/Darwinistic blather, so since your model as no explanatory power, you should stick around and learn more about how much your model really blows.

Tough to take you seriously given the babble on your website. We are not going to agree Moving on people......

Oas, I'll debate you anytime, anywhere, about the relative explanatory powers of your model vs. mine, anytime, oas, are you a student, then maybe we can organize a debate, with audience questions, at your institution, wouldn't that be fun?

Genesis Veracity wrote:Oas, I'll debate you anytime, anywhere, about the relative explanatory powers of your model vs. mine, anytime, oas, are you a student, then maybe we can organize a debate, with audience questions, at your institution, wouldn't that be fun?

Bundles of laughs.

"Bundles of laughs" after I would expose your model as the joke which it is.

"Which is it, the supposed distant human ancestor, the tree shrew or the monkey?"

OAS
D.F.T.T.

Tech wrote:OAS
D.F.T.T.

Yep - thanks for the nudge back on the sanity path Tech.

Oas and Tech, you guys would be much happier in a controlled environment of intellectualism, isn't there some chat room at an institute of higher learning which controls what ideas are allowed to be discussed, which allows only material which comports with the mainstream dogma?

That way, you could remain in you tunnel vision state, in comfort, knowing that you're on the side of truth and intellectual honesty.

And Oas, we could debate there, I could be a guest YEC for you to attempt to rebut.

Don't feed the troll......

Oas, your karma is running over your dogma.