Page 4 of 5
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:42 am
by Guest
I agree - but "we"(meaning the "normal" people on this board) can study ancient writings for what they are.
where is frank??? seems he is so hot on stopping insults yet here is his friend insulting and no provacation in sight. my my my. we have favortism on the board.
glad i am departing as when frank was made moderator, things went downhill fast.{by the way i have already thought of frank sitting there with his hand on the button to keep me from returning after 10/5.}
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 7:50 am
by Minimalist
glad i am departing
You know.....you are starting to remind me of that old country/western song.
"How Can I Miss You If You Won't Ever Leave?"
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 8:36 am
by marduk
we have favortism on the board.
yes i noticed that too
the top five threads have all been started by fundies who have been banned everywhere else for talking crap
i hear that this place is getting its named changed to
www.fundieforum.com but that may just be a piece of wild speculation
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:10 am
by Guest
Yeh Marduk, fundie forum would be a good name, fundie darwinites, and all the rest.
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:03 pm
by Guest
yes i noticed that too
the top five threads have all been started by fundies who have been banned everywhere else for talking crap
actually that is not true. michelle started bosnian II, minimalist started current biblical arch., dayspring started noah's flood and i foget who started intelligent design and bosnian I.
your statemnet of being banned is an out and out lie because you have not been on any of the boards i have been on and i have not been banned for posting my perspective plus how would you know.
so if michelle wants to keep the board clean of rifraf, i guess you should be banned for lying and misrepresenting other posters.
if you noticed, i asked for more information and what version of the Biuble was being used in the original post. receiving no answer leads me to conclude that it was just another false post to draw the religious people into a trap to get them booted from the board.
all you want is a place to go and get rubber stamped for your thinking and ignore real conversations where you get challenged to prove your conclusions.
now again, i asked some questions concerning the original post, willsomeone provide answers or not?
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 7:03 pm
by marduk
see
we should call you T.C. from now on
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 7:13 pm
by oldarchystudent
marduk wrote:see
we should call you T.C. from now on
I'll probably regret asking, but - T.C.???
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 8:38 pm
by marduk
I'll probably regret asking, but - T.C.???
no not top cat
talking crap
see i post a claim that some people at this website talk crap and then only Arch takes offence/volunteers as subject
i guess you should be banned for lying and misrepresenting other posters.
hmmm shall we take a vote
i say you should be called T.C. who else votes for that
I'll add your vote to get the ball rolling Arch
T.C. score 1 ------------- Assologist score 1
yeah
you bought it on yourself didn't ya
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:10 pm
by Beagle
http://www.geocities.com/pak_history/Harappan.html
That seal was a mark of one of the world's great ancient civilizations, but mid-nineteenth-century archaeologists like Cunningham knew nothing about it. The Vedas, the oldest texts of south Asia, dating from some 3,500 years ago, made no mention of it, nor did the Bible. No pyramids or burial mounds marked the area as the site of an ancient power. Yet, 4,600 years ago, at the same time as the early civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt, great cities arose along the flood plains of he ancient Indus and Saraswati rivers in what is now Pakistan and northwest India. The people of the Indus Valley didn't build towering monuments, bury their riches along with their dead, or fight legendary and bloody battles. They didn't have a mighty army or a divine emperor. Yet they were a highly organized and stupendously successful civilization. They built some of the world's first planned cities, created one of the world's first written languages, and thrived in an area twice the size of Egypt and Mesopotamia for 700 years
Some more on the Indus Valley civilization. Good links at the bottom.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:43 pm
by Guest
The Vedas which date to circa 1500 B.C., as the link says, includes the stories that the Seven Rishi Cities of the Rama Empire went under when the sea level rose, and the Kingdom of Kumari Kandam, in the time of Kings Nediyon, Ravenna, and Bali, went under when the sea level rose, so when did that sea level rise occur?
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:58 pm
by Beagle
http://www.geocities.com/olmec982000/Indus.html
An article on Harappan writing. The author makes reference to the Aryan invasion which in fact may not have happened at all.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:05 pm
by Guest
Yes, look at the interrelationship of those ancient languages, they evidently all derived from a more ancient common language, I wonder when those languages branched apart?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:05 am
by Beagle
http://visav.phys.uvic.ca/~babul/AstroC ... appan.html
Although the translation of the Harappan script is still very much a work in progress, there are numerous indications that Harappans were well versed in astronomy
Familiar symbols
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:10 am
by Guest
And the biggest indicaton of them all that the ancient Hindus were well versed in astronomy is that their yuga periods of time were multiples of 432,000 years, and where have we seen the number 432 before? Remember that the dimensions of the Great Pyramid of Giza are a 1/43,200th embodiment of the dimensions of the earth, so the yugas of time were derived with that same methodology, which I just happen to have right here, see article #2 at
http://www.IceAgeCivilizations.com.
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:00 am
by Guest
Notice the ever busy with "important stuff" Paul somehow knew that I had wondered if he was lurking, so he took the time to write his little self-puff piece of avoidance, hey Paul H., on what basis do you think the royal cubit was established, elbow to fingertip, handwidths, or anything else come to mind?