Page 32 of 61

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:39 pm
by oldarchystudent
Let me guess, you wrote this book, didn't you.....

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:40 pm
by Minimalist
oldarchystudent wrote:Let me guess, you wrote this book, didn't you.....

And is probably the only one who has read it. :wink:

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:44 pm
by Guest
Hey, you're pretty quick there archy.

And min, the books are selling quite well, thanks for bringing-up the subject.

And archy, and min, do you see any flaw in the analysis in article #2?

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:49 pm
by oldarchystudent
"432,000 years of pre-Flood Babylonian kings"

Were they Neanderthals?

"Celtic Cross, which was a 360 degree-scaled circular hub that was affixed to a cross which was orientated by a plumb-bob. A facsimile of this device was discovered within the Great Pyramid of Giza"

So you are saying that Jesus was crucified before the pyramids were built?

The ice age ended only 1,500 years ago...

laughable..... EDIT - and your bio says you graduated Dartmouth as a geologist??????

As for your numbers, I have no idea where you pulled them from.

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:52 pm
by Guest
You should start to read for comprehension, archy, it is apparent that you "read" only what you want to misstate.

If that's the extent of your rebuttal, I now know that you're not a serious player.

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:53 pm
by oldarchystudent
Another item from your website:

"Realistically, natural selection's validity can be demonstrated within the animal "kinds," but not between the animal "kinds" as has been popularly and stubbornly maintained by Darwinists. "

How did humans become insulated from the natural laws that govern all other living things?

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:54 pm
by Minimalist
And min, the books are selling quite well, thanks for bringing-up the subject.


There are a lot of Arches out there.

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:55 pm
by oldarchystudent
Genesis Veracity wrote:You should start to read for comprehension, archy, it is apparent that you "read" only what you want to misstate.

If that's the extent of your rebuttal, I now know that you're not a serious player.
Sorry but I find it hard to keep of the sarcasm in the face of things like this.

So let's take them one at a time, shall we? 400,000+ years of Babylonian kings?

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:56 pm
by john
Genesis Veracity wrote:Sorry archy, Critias talked about vast tracts of Greek land which succumbed to the sea, when it was wetter, with much more lush vegetation, and many more springs (Ice Age), so your Thera dealy is absurd, though Thera did go off as the sea level rose a few hundred feet circa 1500 B.C., when Atlantis, and the many other now-submerged ruins in the Med, off India, off Japan, and many other places, went under.

And what about the other ancient people groups who called Atlantis: Atland, Atlan, Aztlan, Attalan, Avalon, and Atlantida?


gosh.

they all begin with A.

now that by god is evidence.

would all you other cretins go huddle in the corner while

it is demonstrated that god,

while directing noah to collect all the animals,

also established one, and the only, language to

be spoken by humans.

it all begins with "A".

i lived in avalon for a while. therefore i must be blessed. but what avalon, catalina island, california has to do with the creation of the world has me a little bemused..........


j

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:59 pm
by Guest
Wow john, that was brilliant.

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:17 pm
by john
Genesis Veracity wrote:Wow john, that was brilliant.
just acknowledging your intellectually profound assessment that 1.) all cultures agree that atlantis existed and, B.) that, no matter what language, it began with an A.

so, my question is, what did the A....A.......Australian aborigines call it?

evidence, please.


j

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:20 pm
by Guest
John, that would be a good project for you.

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:12 pm
by Guest
John, look for evidences of the Atlantean (Phoenician) god Melkart in the lore of the Aborigines of Australia, he was the sun god, like Hercules, so that would be evidence of Atlantean contact/orginal-origin.

I believe the Atlanteans called themselves the Kena'anu (Canaanites), so look for a word like that from the Aborigines.

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:35 pm
by marduk
I believe the Atlanteans called themselves the Kena'anu
is this a personal belief or do you have any evidence
:lol:

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:38 pm
by Guest
Just google it Marduk.