Philo's guide to decoding the Hebrew Bible

The study of religious or heroic legends and tales. One constant rule of mythology is that whatever happens amongst the gods or other mythical beings was in one sense or another a reflection of events on earth. Recorded myths and legends, perhaps preserved in literature or folklore, have an immediate interest to archaeology in trying to unravel the nature and meaning of ancient events and traditions.

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

seeker
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:37 am

Post by seeker »

Forum Monk wrote:Seeker - how long should we continue this tit for tat?
Trying to characterize away the argument? What you are pretending is tit for tat is really you being buried under evidence. I don't mind having the tit while you mouth the tat
Forum Monk wrote:In my opinion your style is to misrepresent yourself and me. You claim to be a biblical scholar and yet you disrepect and revile the supposed object of your study which makes it clear your purpose is not to study it but rather seek out controversies and alledged constradictions to support an atheistic ideology. In fact, you know nothing about christian theology nor hebrew theology as evidenced by the continuous cherry-picking of scriptures to support your anti-religious agenda. You misrepresent me, knowing nothing about my personal life or beliefs and how I came to my conclusions and then set up numerous strawmen and put words in my mouth then berate and beat them with your own agenda-filled interpretations.
Then it should be no problem for you to find clear examples, plainly stated that support your side as I have done. While you try to characterize me in a derogatory fashion I have played no such game with you. Instead I have given you plain and clear evidence.

As to my scholarship and your critique of it I would suggest you rethink your position. The fact that an objective view doesn't agree with your understanding of theology is no reason for your histrionics and accusations, once again if your position had merit it would no problem for you to find clear statements that supported your position.

The fact that you actually found statements that undermined your position and tried to repaint them...well let's just say that maybe you were just a little confused.
Forum Monk wrote:Nevertheless, I can and will continue if it serves the interest of the discussion. I will take it as deep as need go using the scriptures to support my contentions as I began this discussion showing the dissimilarities between early christian and beliefs and gnostic beliefs as presented by Ishtar. I just feel the other members of this board may find it contentious and unnecessary to continue this back and forth with each claiming they are right and the other is wrong. I will not concede my point of view, but I am willing to suspend this line of discussion if it has no hope of progressing.
Whether it progresses or not is up to you but it cannot progress if you are unable to admit the clear meanings of the words you post.
seeker
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:37 am

Post by seeker »

Ishtar wrote:
Actually Seeker, as I'm sure you recognise, this is pure advaita.
8)

I'm just amazed that FM tried to slip that one by.
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

seeker wrote:
Ishtar wrote:
Actually Seeker, as I'm sure you recognise, this is pure advaita.
8)

I'm just amazed that FM tried to slip that one by.
Now you know why I call him 'slippery boy', Seeker!

You gotta love him, though. He's a trier! :lol:
Forum Monk
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: USA

Post by Forum Monk »

Ishtar - your point no. 6 has appeared for the first time in this thread as I can find no reference to the Eleusian Mystery rites anywhere in this thread and only a single reference from John in another thread.

Please elaborate as it appears to be a cult centered on the principle of harvest and spring rebirth. These were very common motifs in ancient religion.
seeker
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:37 am

Post by seeker »

Forum Monk wrote: Ishtar - you are wrong as I copied nothing from anyone, rather transcribed directly from the book
Okay, this is officially one of the funniest things I've ever seen anyone post. Do you know what the word transcribed means FM? :lol: :lol:

Forum Monk wrote:As for your other points - in due time. Seems to me, I am the only one here offering counter arguements as you seeker and min enjoy this little bash the christians party (with occasional distractions from others). Very curious you do not attack other religions with the same zeal. It doesn't matter though, as I am not here to offer myself for martyrdom and I am not arguing a particular dogma nor arging a literal, fundementalist point of view. Spare me the "sinking sand" slaps and assorted ad homs. You think this is a contest that must be won or lost. Why?
A discussion of the roots of religion is not an attack on Christianity. Your taking offense is only based on your own inability to accept objective analysis of Christianity, have you ever considered though that such intolerance is not a good thing.

Had you been following the discussion you'd find that Ish and I agree on quite a few things but were able to do so amicably. The same is true of Min and myself. Maybe you might want to think about exactly what is getting you so upset.
seeker
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:37 am

Post by seeker »

Ishtar wrote:
seeker wrote:
Ishtar wrote:
Actually Seeker, as I'm sure you recognise, this is pure advaita.
8)

I'm just amazed that FM tried to slip that one by.
Now you know why I call him 'slippery boy', Seeker!

You gotta love him, though. He's a trier! :lol:
I actually like FM. He has some spirit, like a spark of the divine just waiting for an epiphany to realize his full potential 8)
Forum Monk
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: USA

Post by Forum Monk »

seeker wrote:Then it should be no problem for you to find clear examples, plainly stated that support your side as I have done. While you try to characterize me in a derogatory fashion I have played no such game with you. Instead I have given you plain and clear evidence.
Your evidence is out of context quotations and does not hold up when shown in complete context inspite of your declarations.
The fact that an objective view doesn't agree with your understanding of theology is no reason for your histrionics and accusations, once again if your position had merit it would no problem for you to find clear statements that supported your position.
Your view is hardly objective as evidenced by your sarcasm and characterizations.
The fact that you actually found statements that undermined your position and tried to repaint them...well let's just say that maybe you were just a little confused.
Strawman and misdirection.
Whether it progresses or not is up to you but it cannot progress if you are unable to admit the clear meanings of the words you post.
Misdirection. This is your way of saying it can not progress unless my point of view of the words agrees with yours.
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

Forum Monk wrote:Ishtar - your point no. 6 has appeared for the first time in this thread as I can find no reference to the Eleusian Mystery rites anywhere in this thread and only a single reference from John in another thread.

Please elaborate as it appears to be a cult centered on the principle of harvest and spring rebirth. These were very common motifs in ancient religion.
Monk - are you kidding? :lol:

I've done little else but talk about the Mystery rites of Eleusis for about a week. So no ... I will not be going back through this thread to show you where ... OPEN YOUR EYES and YOUR MIND.

I don't know why I'm bothering to help you but ..

It is only one opinion that fertility rites are centred on agricultural motifs - and that the rebirth refers to spring. On one level it does, but there are other levels ...

The Lesser Mysteries took place on the Spring Equinox and this is where the water baptism happened.

A select few were then allowed through to the Greater Mysteries which took place on the Autumn Equinox where the second initiation, of fire, was conducted.

(Apologies to other readers of this thread - you are not experiencing deja vue. It's just that Monk has not been paying attention.)

Famous initiates were Plato, Pythagorus, Herodotus, Philo ...and so on.
The Eleusinian Mysteries (Greek: Ἐλευσίνια Μυστήρια) were initiation ceremonies held every year for the cult of Demeter and Persephone based at Eleusis in ancient Greece. Of all the mysteries celebrated in ancient times, these were held to be the ones of greatest importance. These myths and mysteries, begun in the Mycenean period (c. 1700 BC) and lasting two thousand years, were a major festival during the Hellenic era, later spreading to Rome.[1]

The rites, ceremonies, and beliefs were kept secret, as initiation was believed to unite the worshipper with the gods and included promises of divine power and rewards in the afterlife.[2] There are many paintings and pieces of pottery that depict various aspects of the Mysteries. Since the Mysteries involved visions and conjuring of an afterlife, some scholars believe that the power and longevity of the Eleusinian Mysteries came from psychedelic agents.
By the way, you'll notice the date 1700 BC. These are the same mystery rites that you said were contemporaneous with the life of one Jesus Christ Esq.

Please don't bother to reply to me on this by copying from books and encyclopaedias - I know far more about this than any authors you are likely to be familiar with, especially if they're Christian.
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

seeker wrote:
I actually like FM. He has some spirit, like a spark of the divine just waiting for an epiphany to realize his full potential 8)
Yeah....! :lol:

But it's going to take nothing less than the full Damascean epiphany complete with falling from his horse and everything!

Image
Forum Monk
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: USA

Post by Forum Monk »

seeker wrote:Okay, this is officially one of the funniest things I've ever seen anyone post. Do you know what the word transcribed means FM? :lol: :lol:
Give me a break seeker - could you not figure out my meaning? I was accused of copying from another site. I am not an author or english teacher - I'm an engineer and amateur astronomer who happens to know some things about history and science and I did not learn christianity from a church or a priest so everyone can drop the "saying what the church tells you" tact. It is tiring.

Maybe you might want to think about exactly what is getting you so upset.
I am happy to discuss things amicably and in the spirit that we can reach a point of agreeing to disagree. Its not a contest with winners and losers. I get angry when the discussion boils over from topical to a vindictive attack against a religion that has special meaning to millions of people. It is not necessary and serves no purpose.
Last edited by Forum Monk on Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Forum Monk
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: USA

Post by Forum Monk »

Ish - you keep claiming all these massive displays of evidence. I did a search - there were exactly five mentions of Eleusinian rites on this entire board including the first time on this thread in your list of points.

What am I supposed to do - read your mind?
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

Forum Monk wrote:Ish - you keep claiming all these massive displays of evidence. I did a search - there were exactly five mentions of Eleusinian rites on this entire board including the first time on this thread in your list of points.

What am I supposed to do - read your mind?

NO - READ MY POSTS!


Here are three over the past week in this thread where I've referred to the Eleusian Mysteries. There are others ... but the fact is, you don't read my posts so why should I bother replying to you?

Sun August 3rd, 5.42 am

Dying and resurrecting godmen around the Mediterranean

Image

First of all, it's interesting to note that the country which we are expected to believe hosted the real life dying and resurrecting godman is literally surrounded by countries who also had had this same type of godman going back centuries before, but had understood him as myth.

But secondly, the coloured countries are those that fell under the Holy Roman Empire of Constantine. Take a look at Akkad/Sumer - this is the only country outside Constantine's reach, which is probably why we do have textual evidence from there in the form of clay tablets about the life-death-rebirth deity Tammuz/Dumuzi.

But there is next to no textual evidence for the other countries - only fragments - because the Blessed Holy Roman foot soldiers would have seen to that. We know they did so in Eleusia in Greece (under the edict of one of Constantine's successors) where the Mystery initiations had been held since 1700 BC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eleusinian_Mysteries
The Roman emperor Theodosius I closed the sanctuaries by decree in 392 AD as part of his effort to suppress Hellenist resistance to the imposition of Christianity as a state religion. The last remnants of the Mysteries were wiped out in 396 AD, when Alaric, King of the Goths, invaded accompanied by Christians "in their dark garments", bringing Arian Christianity and desecrating the old sacred sites.[16] The closing of the Eleusinian Mysteries in the 4th century is reported by Eunapios, a historian and biographer of the Greek philosophers. Eunapios had been initiated by the last legitimate Hierophant, who had been commissioned by the emperor Julian to restore the Mysteries, which had by then fallen into decay.
So for our evidence, we are reduced to writings about writings that are often in themselves in a very bad way.

Tuesday 5 August 2008, 10.39 pm

The thing about Christianity, that I've been trying to show here anyway, is that it wasn't originally designed to mislead politically - that was just how it ended up. The Literalists of the second century took and ripped the heart out of something that was originally much deeper, richer and more beneficial - i.e. the Mystery initiations that were practised around the Mediterranean, the most famous in Eleusis.

At the very least, these initiations acted as a rite of passage ceremony for young males, and part of the nine-day ceremonies would involve a play about the dying and resurrecting godman. This was an allegory for their leaving behind their old lives as children and being born into a new one as a man.

There was also an initiation that took place that some think could have been induced by fermented barley, but could just as easily have been induced by them being kept in darkness for several days. It was one well used way to induce a trance-like state in those days. Mircae Eliade writes about novice shamans being kept in the darkness of caves for long periods during their training for this same reason.

So this was a much more multi-textured and deeper experience than today's Christianity which can only offer a set of rules and blind faith, and is also now a lame duck politically.


6 August 2008, 10.06 am


Yes that's a good allegory. But both are just allegories for the same thing. An ascent to heaven is also a rebirth from a spiritual point of view, dying to the false self (the ego or known to Gnostics as the the "eidolon") and becoming the True Self.

It's just different ways of saying the same thing.

But for the purpose of this discussion, Plato's quote about saying the Son of Man is suspended crosswise in the universe is at the root of the Gnostic idea of the cross through which the Christ figure pulls through the aspirant in what I suppose, is known as Grace.

That Gnosticism wasn't a threat to Literalist Christians is a laughable idea when you see the extent they went to, to hide the roots of their story of a historical Jesus.

Not only did they burn down the Library of Alexandria and destroy the Mystery Groves of Eleusis, but Justinian 1 of Byzantium also closed down Plato's Academy in Athens in 529 CE because he saw it as threat to Christianity.

Most Western scholars after that did not know about Plato until the Renaissance.
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

and here's some more, FM.

http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewt ... ght=#50787

Sunday 3 August

As mentioned in my previous post, the Eleusinian Mysteries were shut down by Theodosius, a post-Constantine emperor of Rome, because he didn’t want these rites infecting Christianity.

I would suggest that it had already infected Christianity to the point of inventing it – and that it was more likely that Theodosius didn’t want anyone finding that out and starting to ask him awkward questions about a second initiation that purported to give a real face-to-face experience of God.

He was probably already annoyed enough that that one line had been left in Matthew where J the B mentions it ... but it was too late now because it had gone to press.

So his only remedy was to try to cover it up by ordering the destruction of the sacred Mystery groves of Eleusis, as he had done the year before with the Library of Alexandria.

So what were the Eleusinian Mysteries?

The Eleusinian Mystery schools began around 1700 BC as a way of initiating a small, select group of initiates into deeper spiritual, mystic practices by which they could have a direct experience of God/gods.

In other words, this is where they moved from having faith in God/gods to having a practical experience of said same.

Personally, I think it was only a couple of steps removed from shamanism, when people could actually commune with the gods/spirits as equals, and not have to fall flat on their faces in the dirt to worship them.

As time went on, the popularity of these Mysteries grew and grew until they were initiating huge numbers of people into, at least, the Lesser Mysteries – the first (water or baptism) initiation which was held every year on the Spring Equinox.

Some of these, but probably only a few in comparison, were then invited to go on to the Greater Mysteries – the second (fire/light) initiation, which was held yearly on the Autumn Equinox. The proceedings lasted for nine days and culminated in a climatical experience of spiritual ecstasy, possibly (although we don’t know for sure) somewhat induced by a barley drink that may or may not have been fermented.

Now, in my experience in these debates, we usually have to go off on a tangent about now, as we try to reconcile two genetically irreconcilable points of view. Either you see these ritual ceremonies involving psychotropic aids (like soma or peyote) as a means to help open the doors of perception to other realities. Or you see them as just a pathetic excuse used by all sorts of socially undesirable types to get completely off their faces and imagine all sorts of strange things.

I would just like to point out the Beatles used the term Magical Mystery Tour, so maybe they knew something we didn't.

However, I would prefer not to get into that whole debate here as it will detract from the main issue - which is whether the Mystery religions are at the root of Christianity.

So I would like to start examining now the common features of what we know about these second, fire initiations, which is piss-poor thin, admittedly. We are constrained not only because the Holy Roman Empire destroyed whatever it could get its grubby little hands on about it. But also because the initiates themselves were on pain of death to not reveal a thing.

However, we do have some snippets that made it through all that, which I will post next.

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:20 am

One way great writers, poets and artists have used to convey the teachings of Mysteries is by coding it into their work – Leonardo da Vinci being a case in point, Shakespeare/Francis Bacon being another. Mozart would hide cryptic allusions to Freemasonry in his works, notably The Magic Flute ... and the list goes on and on...

So in this tradition, a second century Roman writer called Lucius Apuleius wrote a novel called the The Metamorphosis (or The Golden Ass) where he has his hero undergo one of these initiations.

He is thought to have derived the story from a Greek, Lucius of Patrae. The Greek text has been lost but, according to Wiki, there is a similar tale of unknown authorship that is possibly an abridgement or epitome of Lucius of Patrae's text, wrongly attributed in ancient times to Lucian of Samosata, a contemporary of Apuleius.

Anyway,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Ass
`
Quote:

...Lucius calls for divine aid, and is answered by the goddess Isis. Eager to be initiated into the mystery cult of Isis, Lucius abstains from forbidden foods, bathes and purifies himself [first water initiation - Ish]. Then the secrets of the cult's books are explained to him and further secrets revealed, before going through the process of initiation which involves a trial by the elements in a journey to the underworld.


Here is his description of the climax of the initiation:

“I approached to the confines of death [the Underworld], and having trod on the threshold of Prosperpine [Persephone], I returned from it, being carried through all the elements. At midnight, I saw the sun shining with a splendid light; and I manifestly drew near to the gods beneath and to the gods above, and proximately adored them.”

So just hold that thought about the sun shining with a splendid light at midnight and now, I’m sorry, but I need to jump to India. That’s because these words of Lucius are not a million miles from Arjuna’s after he is granted a vision of the ‘true form’ of his god, Krishna, on the battlefield in the Bhagavad Gita, and I’m pretty sure that this is also an allegorical description of the second fire initiation:

If the light of a thousand suns
should suddenly burst forth in the sky
it would be like the light
of that exalted one.
The whole world there united,
And divided many-fold,
the son of Pandu then
beheld in the God of Gods' body
A mass of radiance, glowing on all sides,
I see Thee, hard to look at, on every side
With the glory of flaming fire and sun, immeasurable.
Without beginning, middle or end, of infinite power,
of infinite arms, whose eyes are the moon and sun,
I see thee, whose face is flaming fire,
Burning this whole universe with Thy radiance.
_________________
Ishtar :
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

So Monk, that's five of my posts that you haven't bothered to read this week. This little exercise has just proved to me that you have no genuine interest in anything I have to say on this subject, in which you are only interested in the sound of your own voice.

But now that I've shown these unread posts to you, please don't come back on here with a copy and paste from the apologists' encyclopaedias about why I'm wrong.

You can't come on here and debate with me if you don't read my posts and have no previous knowledge of the subjects that I'm talking about.
Forum Monk
Posts: 1999
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: USA

Post by Forum Monk »

Well I guess I owe you an apology as I used "Eleusian Mystery rites" as my search term. And I admit while I have read your posts I don't usually check all the links because if I had, it may have sunk in better.

What I have been doing here, is going back and addressing things and searching them out kind of "after the fact" as time permits. So I often browse and if the post looks like a recapitulation of ideas I already read, I takes some notes, then go back later and dig deeper. After all there is a lot in this thread from you, seeker, Min, John and Patty and noone on this board is giving me much support apart from an occasional blurb by KB.

I like this list, though and thanks for this. It gives me a nice list of topics that can be addressed individually over time. (I copied it for off-line research).

btw -
But now that I've shown these unread posts to you, please don't come back on here with a copy and paste from the apologists' encyclopaedias about why I'm wrong.
There is no quote from me from an apologist website in this thread that I can remember - but don't try to dictate what constitutes a viable source. If the argment is relevent I reserve the right to post it.
Post Reply