Archaeologica.org

Beagle wrote:http://piramide.jahu.net/piramide.php/2006/06/29

It's late in Bosnia I know, but can anyone translate what it says under the top picture on this page?

It's a new pic and it looks like it could be a corner.

I wish that website was available in English.

yea they say its the corner of the pyramid

Oh man - we're really gonna need all the info on that. We might have to wait 'till morning though (for the US).

Thanks GG!

Obviously a natural formation.


(Just figured I'd beat the geology club to the punch.)

Min - you're bad. Right though. I just got caught up with todays events here. Glad I wasn't here

In the last news from the Foundation (http://www.piramidasunca.ba/news/news_i ... NewsID=144) they claim they have found the "edge" of the pyramid of the Sun. It's in the probe number 17, between the north and east face of the pyramid. They say the "breccia" stones form a "perfect form of edge of pyramid". The geologist Ibrica Repisti confirms that the angles of the stones match the "perfect geometry of a pyramid".

There is nothing more about this "angle" on the official site.

Irna

they claim they have found the "edge" of the pyramid of the Sun

They say the "breccia" stones form a "perfect form of edge of pyramid". The geologist Ibrica Repisti confirms that the angles of the stones match the "perfect geometry of a pyramid".

they are joking right? i saw no stones in that picture posted.

archaeologist wrote:
they are joking right? i saw no stones in that picture posted.

This one ? :



I think there may be stone beneath the dirt. But what I would like is a general view of it, the pictures are taken very close and you cannot see how it matches the global form of the slope.

Irna

Irna we appreciate that. I take it that you speak Bosnian. Thats good to know. It's a big problem for most of us over here.

so they have x-ray eyes now?

I think there may be stone beneath the dirt

kind of hard looking at that picture and seeing a 'perfect angle' when all it is is a dirt lump. then if yo compare that with real pyramids you will notice that the ground around this 'rock' does not support the idea that a pyramid is there.

some questions that need to be answered: is this the top, middle or the bottom edge?
where is the rest of the pyramid?
why is the ground looking like a normal mountian and not a wall?
where is the baseline for the other sides of the pyramids if this is the bottom?
where are the other angles if this is the top?
where is the peak?
if this is the middle of the pyramid where is the rest of the angle?

if this is their idea of perfect then i hate to see their idea of bad.

Beagle wrote:Irna we appreciate that. I take it that you speak Bosnian.

Well no, I don't "speak" it, I think I would not be able to ask my way in Visoko :-). But I learned it, a long time ago (at a time when officially there was no bosnian, serbian or croatian, you could only learn "serbo-croatian" in french university), and I'm able, with sometimes the help of a dictionnary, to understand and translate short texts in french or english !

Irna

French University? Well it was nice of you to help. Bye.

archaeologist wrote: if this is their idea of perfect then i hate to see their idea of bad.

:-)

You could maybe take a look at the little try I made about the "perfect form" of the pyramid, which was one of the first arguments of M. Osmanagic since the beginning. It's here : http://irna.lautre.net/article.php3?id_article=9
It's in french, but maybe you can have an idea of what I meant by the pictures.

Irna

Rats.

All the French I know is "Vive L'Empereur."

Katherine Reece wrote:

I would like to know what is your game, I dont think you have right to discuss something unless you are involved into it.

I'm playing no game. You don't think I have a right to discuss something unless I'm involved in it? Really?

You are never been at Visoko site but you have been on every single forum making up things and placing lies, roumors and nonsense.

Ah ... so now the insults begin. Its is no lie that Doug and I have been in touch with the archaeologists that Osmanagic has claimed are working on his site, and it is no lie that everyone that we have contacted are NOT working on his site. It is no lie that I can look at the pictures of the excavations and tell that proper methodology does not appear to be followed.

If you are playing NO game way you just contact people who gave initial approval that will work on the project and you didn't contact anybody who is right now in Visoko and working on the excavation. Very, very strange and I think Doug and you just call people to discurage them to go to Bosnia. That you care about proper methodology as a professional and an expert in archeology (as you think about your self and people around you) you would be call the guys in Bosnia first to tell them that is no proper way how they’re doing.

I think Doug and you just call people to discurage them to go to Bosnia.

Oh yeah ... we have that power.

That you care about proper methodology as a professional and an expert in archeology (as you think about your self and people around you)

~sigh~ when did I say I'm an expert?

Never mind ... I disagree with you and Osmanagic that there was a supercivilization 12,000 years ago that was in contact with the Mesoamericans and the Egyptians (even though there was no civilizations in Mesoamerica or Egypt during this time) and I disagree with Osmanagic that the Maya came from space and went to Atlantis and then to Mexico and then back to space again.

I don't see any form of agriculture that could support such a construction as Osmanagic is claiming and scientific studies (that I quoted here) have proven such such agriculture was not possible 12,000 years ago.

Since I disagree I'm an idiot and I have no idea because I'm not there and I read books. Fantastic...

And please don't try to tell me I'm misquoting him as that is what he wrote.

So if that's what you what the archaeology of your country to represent... then more power to you .. have fun... enjoy....

Ta ta ...